Optical and thermal performance of double receiver compound parabolic concentrator

被引:39
作者
Abdullahi, B. [1 ]
AL-Dadah, R. K. [1 ]
Mahmoud, S. [1 ]
Hood, R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Sch Mech Engn, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
关键词
HPCPC; Double tube receiver CPC; Optical ray tracing; Concentration ratio; Acceptance angle; Thermosyphon; CPC SOLAR COLLECTORS; EVACUATED TUBE;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.08.063
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Conventional solar compound parabolic concentrators are normally fitted with one tubular receiver positioned along the axis of the two parabolas. This work investigates the potential of using either two tubular receivers in one compound parabolic concentrator or an elliptical single receiver. Using advanced ray tracing technique, the optical efficiency of a compound parabolic concentrator with two tubular receivers aligned horizontally and vertically was predicted. Results showed that the horizontal configuration outperforms both the single and the vertical configurations by up to 15%. Also, a horizontally aligned elliptical single tube showed an increase in the average daily optical efficiency by 17% compared to the single tube configuration. The thermal performance of the single and double horizontally aligned tubular receivers was determined using a thermosyphon heat pipe experimentally tested utilising the heat flux obtained from the optical simulation at different acceptance angles. Results show that double tube configuration thermally outperforms the single one in terms of heat transferred to the cooling water by 21%, 19.8% and 18.3% for acceptance angles of 30 degrees, 40 degrees and 60 degrees respectively. This work highlights the potential of using either two tubular receivers or single elliptical one aligned horizontally in one concentrator to improve the optical and thermal efficiencies of compound parabolic collectors. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 10
页数:10
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Optical Performance of Double Receiver Compound Parabolic Concentrator [J].
Abdullahi, B. ;
Al-dadah, R. K. ;
Mouhmud, S. .
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED ENERGY, ICAE2014, 2014, 61 :2625-2628
[2]  
Abdullahi B., 2013, INT C REN EN POW QUA
[3]   CFD modeling of flow and heat transfer in a thermosyphon [J].
Alizadehdakhel, Asghar ;
Rahimi, Masoud ;
Alsairafi, Ammar Abdulaziz .
INTERNATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS IN HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER, 2010, 37 (03) :312-318
[4]   A thermal comparison performance of CPC with modified (dual-cavity) and non-modified absorber [J].
Azhari, AA ;
Khonkar, HE .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 1996, 9 (1-4) :584-588
[5]  
Cengel Y.A., 2003, McGraw-Hill Series in Mechanical Engineering
[6]   Thermal Performance Testing of Heat Pipe Evacuated Tube with Compound Parabolic Concentrating Solar Collector by ISO 9806-1 [J].
Chamsa-ard, Wisut ;
Sukchai, Sukruedee ;
Sonsaree, Sorawit ;
Sirisamphanwong, Chatchai .
11TH ECO-ENERGY AND MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING (11TH EMSES), 2014, 56 :237-246
[7]  
Chaves J, 2008, INTRO NONIMAGING OPT
[8]  
Duffle JA., 2006, Solar engineering of thermal processes, V3rd
[9]   THERMAL AND OPTICAL CONSEQUENCES OF THE INTRODUCTION OF BAFFLES INTO COMPOUND PARABOLIC CONCENTRATING SOLAR-ENERGY COLLECTOR CAVITIES [J].
EAMES, PC ;
NORTON, B .
SOLAR ENERGY, 1995, 55 (02) :139-150
[10]   Analytic solutions for the geometric and optical properties of stationary compound parabolic concentrators with fully illuminated inverted V receiver [J].
Fraidenraich, Naum ;
Tiba, Chigueru ;
Brandao, Braulio B. ;
Vilela, Olga C. .
SOLAR ENERGY, 2008, 82 (02) :132-143