ISOLATING BEHAVIORAL MECHANISMS OF INTERTEMPORAL CHOICE: NICOTINE EFFECTS ON DELAY DISCOUNTING AND AMOUNT SENSITIVITY

被引:43
作者
Locey, Matthew L. [1 ]
Dallery, Jesse [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Psychol, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
关键词
risk; impulsive choice; reinforer delay; reinforcer amount; nicotine; lever press; rats; QUANTITATIVE-ANALYSIS; CIGARETTE SMOKERS; EQUIVALENCE RULE; IMPULSIVE CHOICE; REINFORCEMENT; PREFERENCE; REWARDS; TESTS; NEVER;
D O I
10.1901/jeab.2009.91-213
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Many drugs of abuse produce changes in impulsive choice, that is, choice for a smaller-sooner reinforcer over a larger-later reinforcer. Because the alternatives differ in both delay and amount, it is not clear whether these drug effects are due to the differences in reinforcer delay or amount.. To isolate the effects of delay, we used a titrating delay procedure. In phase 1, 9 rats made discrete choices between variable delays (1 or 19 s, equal probability of each) and a delay to a single food pellet. The computer titrated the delay to a single food pellet until the rats were indifferent between the two options. This indifference delay was used as the starting value for the titrating delay for all future sessions. We next evaluated the acute effects, of nicotine (subcutaneous 1.0, 0.3, 0.1, and 0.03 mg/kg) oil choice. If nicotine increases delay discounting, it should have increased preference for the variable delay. Instead, nicotine had very little effect on choice. In a second phase, the titrated delay alternative produced three food pellets instead of one, which was again produced by the variable delay (1 s or 19 s) alternative. Under this procedure, nicotine increased preference for the one pellet alternative. Nicotine-induced changes in impulsive choice are therefore likely due to differences in reinforcer amount rather than differences in reinforcer delay. In addition, it may be necessary to include an amount sensitivity parameter in any mathematical model of choice when the alternatives differ in reinforcer amount.
引用
收藏
页码:213 / 223
页数:11
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Delay discounting in current and never-before cigarette smokers: Similarities and differences across commodity, sign, and magnitude [J].
Baker, F ;
Johnson, MW ;
Bickel, WK .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 112 (03) :382-392
[2]   PREFERENCES FOR FIXED AND VARIABLE FOOD SOURCES - VARIABILITY IN AMOUNT AND DELAY [J].
BATESON, M ;
KACELNIK, A .
JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 1995, 63 (03) :313-329
[3]   Impulsivity and cigarette smoking: delay discounting in current, never, and ex-smokers [J].
Bickel, WK ;
Odum, AL ;
Madden, GJ .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1999, 146 (04) :447-454
[4]   PREFERENCE FOR MIXED VERSUS CONSTANT DELAY OF REINFORCEMENT [J].
CICERONE, RA .
JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 1976, 25 (02) :257-261
[5]   Effects of acute and chronic nicotine on impulsive choice in rats [J].
Dallery, J ;
Locey, ML .
BEHAVIOURAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2005, 16 (01) :15-23
[7]   SCALAR EXPECTANCY-THEORY AND CHOICE BETWEEN DELAYED REWARDS [J].
GIBBON, J ;
FAIRHURST, S ;
CHURCH, RM ;
KACELNIK, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1988, 95 (01) :102-114
[9]   Rate of temporal discounting decreases with amount of reward [J].
Green, L ;
Myerson, J ;
McFadden, E .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1997, 25 (05) :715-723
[10]  
HERNSTEIN RJ, 1970, J EXPT ANAL BEHAVIOR, V13, P243