Effects of high-fidelity simulation based on life-threatening clinical condition scenarios on learning outcomes of undergraduate and postgraduate nursing students: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:105
作者
La Cerra, Carmen [1 ]
Dante, Angelo [1 ]
Caponnetto, Valeria [1 ]
Franconi, Ilaria [1 ]
Gaxhja, Elona [1 ]
Petrucci, Cristina [1 ]
Alfes, Celeste M. [2 ]
Lancia, Loreto [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aquila, Dept Hlth Life & Environm Sci, Laquila, Italy
[2] Case Western Reserve Univ, France Payne Bolton Sch Nursing, Ctr Nursing Educ Simulat & Innovat, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
SELF-EFFICACY; PATIENT SIMULATION; KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION; STANDARDIZED PATIENTS; MEDICAL-EDUCATION; SKILLS; SATISFACTION; CONFIDENCE; COMPETENCE; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025306
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective The purpose was to analyse the effectiveness of high-fidelity patient simulation (HFPS) based on life-threatening clinical condition scenarios on undergraduate and postgraduate nursing students' learning outcomes. Design A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted based on the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and its reporting was checked against the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist. Data sources PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL with Full Text, Wiley Online Library and Web of Science were searched until July 2017. Author contact, reference and citation lists were checked to obtain additional references. Study selection To be included, available full-texts had to be published in English, French, Spanish or Italian and (a) involved undergraduate or postgraduate nursing students performing HFPS based on life-threatening clinical condition scenarios, (b) contained control groups not tested on the HFPS before the intervention, (c) contained data measuring learning outcomes such as performance, knowledge, self-confidence, self-efficacy or satisfaction measured just after the simulation session and (d) reported data for meta-analytic synthesis. Review method Three independent raters screened the retrieved studies using a coding protocol to extract data in accordance with inclusion criteria. Synthesis method For each study, outcome data were synthesised using meta-analytic procedures based on random-effect model and computing effect sizes by Cohen's d with a 95% CI. Results Thirty-three studies were included. HFPS sessions showed significantly larger effects sizes for knowledge (d=0.49, 95% CI [0.17 to 0.81]) and performance (d=0.50, 95% CI [0.19 to 0.81]) when compared with any other teaching method. Significant heterogeneity among studies was detected. Conclusions Compared with other teaching methods, HFPS revealed higher effects sizes on nursing students' knowledge and performance. Further studies are required to explore its effectiveness in improving nursing students' competence and patient outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]   An Updated Review of Published Simulation Evaluation Instruments [J].
Adamson, Katie Anne ;
Kardong-Edgren, Suzan ;
Willhaus, Janet .
CLINICAL SIMULATION IN NURSING, 2013, 9 (09) :E393-E400
[2]   Implementation and outcome evaluation of high-fidelity simulation scenarios to integrate cognitive and psychomotor skills for Korean nursing students [J].
Ahn, Heejung ;
Kim, Hyun-Young .
NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2015, 35 (05) :706-711
[3]   Effectiveness of Simulation on Knowledge Acquisition, Knowledge Retention, and Self-Efficacy of Nursing Students in Jordan [J].
Akhu-Zaheya, Laila M. ;
Gharaibeh, Muntaha K. ;
Alostaz, Ziad M. .
CLINICAL SIMULATION IN NURSING, 2013, 9 (09) :E335-E342
[4]   Simulation-based medical teaching and learning [J].
Al-Elq, Abdulmohsen H. .
JOURNAL OF FAMILY AND COMMUNITY MEDICINE, 2010, 17 (01) :35-40
[5]   Effectiveness of intermediate-fidelity simulation training technology in undergraduate nursing education [J].
Alinier, G ;
Hunt, B ;
Gordon, R ;
Harwood, C .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2006, 54 (03) :359-369
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2001, NURS CONTR PROV COMP
[7]  
[Anonymous], INT J NURS ED SCHOLA
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Introd. Meta-Anal., DOI DOI 10.1002/9780470743386.CH7
[9]  
[Anonymous], INT J NURS ED SCHOLA
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2016, BMC MED EDUC, DOI DOI 10.1186/s12909-016-0672-7