Does fluence smoothing reduce the complexity of the intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment plan? A dosimetric analysis

被引:4
作者
Saroj, Dinesh Kumar [1 ,2 ]
Yadav, Suresh [3 ,4 ]
Paliwal, Neetu [2 ]
机构
[1] Alexis Multispecialty Hosp, Dept Radiotherapy, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
[2] Rabindranath Tagore Univ, Dept Phys, Bhopal, India
[3] Gandhi Med Coll, Dept Radiat Oncol, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
[4] Gandhi Med Coll, Dept Radiat Oncol, Bhopal 462001, Madhya Pradesh, India
关键词
Complexity; fluence; gamma passing rate; monitor units; radiotherapy; IMRT; VERIFICATION; RADIOTHERAPY; EFFICIENCY; QUALITY; CANCER; NUMBER; IMPACT;
D O I
10.4103/jmp.jmp_81_22
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) may have too many peaks and valleys, making the treatment plan undeliverable. When there are too many fluency differences between adjacent pixels in the X or Y directions, the X and Y smoothing factors are utilized as weighting factors to penalize this behavior. Generally, a high degree of complexity is accompanied by many monitor units (MUs), large number of segments, small sized segments, and complex segment shapes. The degree of plan delivery uncertainty can all increase with a higher detailed fluence map. Aim: This study aims to evaluate the dosimetric effects of various smoothing levels on the planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OARs) for cervix cancer. Materials and Methods: IMRT treatment plans were re-optimized by combining several values of the X and Y penalty between 0 and 100. The dose-volume histogram assessed various dosimetric indicators for PTV and OARs. Additionally, gamma passing rates were evaluated and noted as an indicator of the complex treatment plan. Results: At X = 60, Y = 60 fluence map penalty, the conformity index (CI) value reached its highest value of 0.996 & PLUSMN; 0.004. At X = 0, Y = 0, the homogeneity index (HI) was determined to have a maximum value of 0.0628 & PLUSMN; 0.0235. The highest and lowest MU values were 2424.30 & PLUSMN; 471.12 and 1087.80 & PLUSMN; 91.57, respectively, with X = 0, Y = 0 and X = 100, Y = 100. At X = 100, Y = 100, the gamma passing rate reaches its highest value of 99.28% & PLUSMN; 0.44% and minimum value of 85.93% & PLUSMN; 3.87% at X = 0, Y = 0. Conclusion: The CI and HI values showed no discernible fluctuation, and the OAR doses were barely affected as smoothing was increased. When the smoothing factor was raised, the number of MUs sharply dropped, and a decrease in the number of segments and higher gamma passing rates were also seen.
引用
收藏
页码:336 / 343
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Evaluation of fluence-smoothing feature for three IMRT planning systems [J].
Anker, Christopher J. ;
Wang, Brian ;
Tobler, Matt ;
Chapek, Julie ;
Shrieve, Dennis C. ;
Hitchcock, Ying J. ;
Salter, Bill J. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 11 (02) :33-61
[2]   Effect of smoothing on treatment plan efficiency in IMRT: eclipse Helios (TM) dose optimisation [J].
Armoogum, K. S. .
JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE, 2012, 11 (04) :229-238
[3]  
Bakiu Erjona, 2013, Acta Inform Med, V21, P211, DOI 10.5455/aim.2013.21.211-212
[4]   Direct aperture optimization as a means of reducing the complexity of intensity modulated radiation therapy plans [J].
Broderick, Maria ;
Leech, Michelle ;
Coffey, Mary .
RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2009, 4
[5]   The role of radiotherapy in cancer treatment - Estimating optimal utilization from a review of evidence-based clinical guidelines [J].
Delaney, G ;
Jacob, S ;
Featherstone, C ;
Barton, M .
CANCER, 2005, 104 (06) :1129-1137
[6]   Direct machine parameter optimization for intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) of oropharyngeal cancer - a planning study [J].
Dobler, Barbara ;
Koelbl, Oliver ;
Bogner, Ludwig ;
Pohl, Fabian .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 10 (04) :4-15
[7]   Quantification of beam complexity in intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment plans [J].
Du, Weiliang ;
Cho, Sang Hyun ;
Zhang, Xiaodong ;
Hoffman, Karen E. ;
Kudchadker, Rajat J. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (02)
[8]   What is an acceptably smoothed fluence? Dosimetric and delivery considerations for dynamic sliding window IMRT [J].
Giorgia, Nicolini ;
Antonella, Fogliata ;
Eugenio, Vanetti ;
Alessandro, Clivio ;
Filippo, Ammazzalorso ;
Luca, Cozzi .
RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2007, 2
[9]   Radiation-induced second cancers: The impact of 3D-CRT and IMRT [J].
Hall, EJ ;
Wuu, CS .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2003, 56 (01) :83-88
[10]   The ICRU Report 83: Regulation, Documentation and Communication in the fluence of Modulated Photon radiotherapy (MRT) [J].
Hodapp, N. .
STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2012, 188 (01) :97-99