Dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers: basic pharmacological similarities but fundamental therapeutic differences

被引:37
|
作者
Meredith, PA [1 ]
Elliott, HL [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Glasgow, Western Infirm, Gardiner Inst, Div Cardiovasc & Med Sci, Glasgow G11 6NT, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
calcium channel blocker; cardiovascular outcome; sympathetic activation; long duration of action; dihydropyridine;
D O I
10.1097/00004872-200409000-00002
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Recent trials indicate that treatment with calcium channel blockers (CCBs) reduces cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertensive patients (including those with significant coronary artery disease). Since the fundamental mechanism of action of all CCBs is the same, it might be assumed that the findings of these outcome studies can be generalized to all types of CCB. However, in the light of the well-recognized clinical pharmacological differences between the 'rate-limiting' agents, verapamil and diltiazem, and the dihydropyridine group of CCBs, this must be considered to be a misconception. Less well-recognized, and often ignored, are the significant differences between agents within the dihydropyridine group. These differences translate to distinct differences in the therapeutic profiles and may well translate into differences in outcome during long-term treatment. Thus, the differences in pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and therapeutic profiles make it clear that caution should be exercised in assuming that all dihydropyridine CCBs licensed for once-daily administration are equivalent in terms of their durations of action and overall antihypertensive efficacy. (C) 2004 Lippincott Williams Wilkins.
引用
收藏
页码:1641 / 1648
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] POLYMORPHISM OF PHARMACOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF CALCIUM-CHANNEL BLOCKERS
    IVANOVA, TM
    PODOSINOVIKOVA, NP
    DOLGOSABUROV, VB
    PREDTECHENSKY, MB
    STEPANOVA, NA
    FARMAKOLOGIYA I TOKSIKOLOGIYA, 1990, 53 (02): : 34 - 36
  • [32] SELECTED PHARMACOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF CALCIUM-CHANNEL BLOCKERS
    SOBEL, BE
    ALABAMA JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 1985, 22 (03): : 274 - 280
  • [33] THERAPEUTIC USES OF CALCIUM-CHANNEL BLOCKERS
    ZARET, GM
    AMERICAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 1983, 27 (04) : 210 - 221
  • [34] Calcium channel blockers: Differences between subclasses
    Frishman, William H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR DRUGS, 2007, 7 : 17 - 23
  • [35] The Pharmacological Differences in Antianginal Effects of Long-lasting Calcium Channel Blockers: Azelnidipine and Amlodipine
    Fujisawa, Michio
    Yorikane, Ryosuke
    Matsuoka, Yuko
    Koike, Hiroyuki
    Ueno, Koichi
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY, 2013, 61 (01) : 63 - 69
  • [36] Calcium Channel Blockers: Differences Between Subclasses
    William H. Frishman
    American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs, 2007, 7 (Suppl 1) : 17 - 23
  • [37] SPECIES-DIFFERENCES IN THE NEGATIVE INOTROPIC RESPONSE OF 1,4-DIHYDROPYRIDINE CALCIUM-CHANNEL BLOCKERS IN MYOCARDIUM
    BOYD, RA
    GIACOMINI, JC
    GIACOMINI, KM
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY, 1988, 12 (06) : 650 - 657
  • [38] Dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers may increase mortality in patients with heart failure
    Howlett, JG
    Johnstone, DE
    Cox, JL
    CIRCULATION, 2003, 108 (17) : 341 - 341
  • [39] Angioedema associated with dihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers in a child with Burkitt lymphoma
    Pierce, Wesly A.
    Hederman, April D.
    Gordon, Catherine J.
    Ostrenga, Andrew R.
    Herrington, Betty
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2011, 68 (05) : 402 - 406
  • [40] A cautionary note for nephrologists: Is it time to abandon the use of dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers?
    Jafar, TH
    Pereira, BJG
    SEMINARS IN DIALYSIS, 1999, 12 (03) : 137 - 139