Long-term follow-up after surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using high-density pedicle screw constructs: Is 5-year routine visit required?

被引:8
作者
Mac-Thiong, Jean-Marc [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Remondino, Rodrigo [4 ]
Joncas, J. [2 ]
Parent, Stefan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Labelle, Hubert [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montreal, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] CHU St Justine, Dept Surg, 3175 Cote St Catherine, Montreal, PQ H3T 1C5, Canada
[3] Hop Sacre Coeur, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] Hosp Pediatra Prof Dr Juan P Garrahan, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
关键词
Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; Quality of life; Scoliosis; Spinal deformity; Spine; POSTERIOR SPINAL-FUSION; CURVE-CORRECTION; ANCHOR DENSITY; REVISION; OUTCOMES; INSTRUMENTATION; SURGERY; NUMBER;
D O I
10.1007/s00586-019-05887-5
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
PurposeThe objective of this study is to determine whether routine follow-up 5years after adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) surgery is likely to affect postoperative care for patients treated with high-density pedicle screw constructs, when routine 2-year follow-up has been performed.MethodsWe reviewed 80 patients undergoing surgery for AIS using high-density pedicle screw constructs and followed routinely 2 and 5years after surgery. Quality of life (QOL) was assessed using the SRS-30 outcome questionnaire. Reoperations occurring between 2 and 5years after surgery were identified.ResultsCurve correction and QOL were similar between 2- and 5-year visits. Two patients required revision surgery after presenting during unplanned visits between the 2- and 5-year follow-ups. One patient presented at the routine 5-year visit with an asymptomatic undisplaced rod fracture without loss of correction, and it was decided to follow-up only as needed.ConclusionsIn AIS patients for whom routine follow-up 2years after surgery using high-density pedicle screw constructs was uneventful, additional routine 5-year follow-up is not likely to affect postoperative care and revision rate. Patients developing complications and needing reoperation between 2 and 5years after surgery will most likely present during unplanned visits rather than during routine follow-up appointments. Easy access to emergent visits on an as-needed basis is therefore important for this population if routine 5-year follow-up is not planned.Graphical abstractThese slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material. [GRAPHICS] .
引用
收藏
页码:1296 / 1300
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   5-Year Reoperation Risk and Causes for Revision After Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgery [J].
Ahmed, Syed Imraan ;
Bastrom, Tracey P. ;
Yaszay, Burt ;
Newton, Peter O. .
SPINE, 2017, 42 (13) :999-1005
[2]   Low-density versus high-density thoracic pedicle screw constructs in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: do more screws lead to a better outcome? [J].
Bharucha, Neil J. ;
Lonner, Baron S. ;
Auerbach, Joshua D. ;
Kean, Kristin E. ;
Trobisch, Per D. .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2013, 13 (04) :375-381
[3]   Correlation of Scoliosis Curve Correction With the Number and Type of Fixation Anchors [J].
Clements, David H. ;
Betz, Randal R. ;
Newton, Peter O. ;
Rohmiller, Michael ;
Marks, Michelle C. ;
Bastrom, Tracey .
SPINE, 2009, 34 (20) :2147-2150
[4]   Are Routine Postoperative Radiographs Necessary During the First Year After Posterior Spinal Fusion for Idiopathic Scoliosis? A Retrospective Cohort Analysis of Implant Failure and Surgery Revision Rates [J].
Garg, Sumeet ;
Kipper, Emily ;
LaGreca, Jaren ;
Carry, Patrick ;
Erickson, Mark .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 2015, 35 (01) :33-38
[5]   Do Anchor Density or Pedicle Screw Density Correlate With Short-Term Outcome Measures in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgery? [J].
Gebhart, Sandra ;
Alton, Timothy B. ;
Bompadre, Viviana ;
Krengel, Walter F. .
SPINE, 2014, 39 (02) :E104-E110
[6]   Five-year clinical and radiographic outcomes using pedicle screw only constructs in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis [J].
Hwang, Steven W. ;
Samdani, Amer F. ;
Marks, Michelle ;
Bastrom, Tracy ;
Garg, Hitesh ;
Lonner, Baron ;
Bennett, James T. ;
Pahys, Joshua ;
Shah, Suken ;
Miyanji, Firoz ;
Shufflebarger, Harry ;
Newton, Peter ;
Betz, Randal .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2013, 22 (06) :1292-1299
[7]   Surgical revision rates of hooks versus hybrid versus screws versus combined anteroposterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis [J].
Kuklo, Timothy R. ;
Potter, Benjamin K. ;
Lenke, Lawrence G. ;
Polly, David W., Jr. ;
Sides, Brenda ;
Bridwell, Keith H. .
SPINE, 2007, 32 (20) :2258-2264
[8]   Does Higher Anchor Density Result in Increased Curve Correction and Improved Clinical Outcomes in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis? [J].
Larson, A. Noelle ;
Polly, David W., Jr. ;
Diamond, Beverly ;
Ledonio, Charles ;
Richards, B. Stephens, III ;
Emans, John B. ;
Sucato, Daniel J. ;
Johnston, Charles E. .
SPINE, 2014, 39 (07) :571-578
[9]   Coronal and Sagittal Plane Correction in Patients With Lenke 1 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis A Comparison of Consecutive Versus Interval Pedicle Screw Placement [J].
Li, Ming ;
Shen, Yu ;
Fang, Xiutong ;
Ni, Jianqiang ;
Gu, Suxi ;
Zhu, Xiaodong ;
Zhang, Zhiyu .
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2009, 22 (04) :251-256
[10]   Evolution of Surgery for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Over 20 Years Have Outcomes Improved? [J].
Lonner, Baron S. ;
Ren, Yuan ;
Yaszay, Burt ;
Cahill, Patrick J. ;
Shah, Suken A. ;
Betz, Randal R. ;
Samdani, Amer F. ;
Shufflebarger, Harry L. ;
Newton, Peter O. .
SPINE, 2018, 43 (06) :402-410