Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis for flexoelectric nanostructures

被引:193
作者
Hamdia, Khader M. [2 ]
Ghasemi, Hamid [3 ]
Zhuang, Xiaoying [4 ]
Alajlan, Naif [1 ]
Rabczuk, Timon [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] King Saud Univ, Coll Comp & Informat Sci, Dept Comp Engn, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[2] Bauhaus Univ Weimar, Inst Struct Mech, Marienstr 15, D-99423 Weimar, Germany
[3] Arak Univ Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Arak 3818141167, Iran
[4] Leibniz Univ Hannover, Inst Continuum Mech, Appelstr 11, D-30167 Hannover, Germany
关键词
Flexoelectricity; Piezoelectricity; Isogeometric analysis (IGA); Sensitivity analysis; TOPOLOGY OPTIMIZATION; ISOGEOMETRIC ANALYSIS; POLYNOMIAL CHAOS; ENERGY HARVESTERS; MODEL; FRAMEWORK; STRESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.cma.2018.03.016
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In this paper, sensitivity analysis has been applied to identify the key input parameters influencing the energy conversion factor (ECF) of flexoelectric materials. The governing equations of flexoelectricity are modeled by a NURBS-based IGA formulation exploiting their higher order continuity and hence avoiding a complex mixed formulation. The examined input parameters include model and material properties, and the sampling has been obtained using the latin hypercube sampling (LHS) method in the probability space. The sensitivity of the model output to each of the input parameters at different aspect ratios of the beam is quantified by three various common methods, i.e. Morris One-At-a-Time (MOAT), PCE-Sobol', and Extended Fourier amplitude sensitivity test (EFAST). The numerical results indicate that the flexoelectric constants are the most dominant factors influencing the uncertainties in the energy conversion factor, in particular the transversal flexoelectric coefficient (h(12)). Moreover, the model parameters also show considerable interaction effects of the material properties. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 109
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Adaptive multi-index collocation for uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis
    Jakeman, John D.
    Eldred, Michael S.
    Geraci, Gianluca
    Gorodetsky, Alex
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 2020, 121 (06) : 1314 - 1343
  • [42] Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis for models with correlated parameters
    Xu, Chonggang
    Gertner, George Zdzislaw
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2008, 93 (10) : 1563 - 1573
  • [43] Sensitivity Analysis and Uncertainty of a Myocardial Infarction Model
    Chen-Charpentier, Benito
    Kojouharov, Hristo
    MATHEMATICS, 2024, 12 (14)
  • [44] Sensitivity analysis and uncertainty estimation for nanoscale MOSFET
    Yu, Panpan
    Sun, Ling
    Cheng, Jiali
    Gao, Jianjun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NUMERICAL MODELLING-ELECTRONIC NETWORKS DEVICES AND FIELDS, 2018, 31 (05)
  • [45] A Computational Method for Sensitivity Analysis under Uncertainty
    Wang, Hongchun
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LOGISTICS, ENGINEERING, MANAGEMENT AND COMPUTER SCIENCE (LEMCS 2015), 2015, 117 : 326 - 330
  • [46] Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis for detailed design support
    Hopfe, Christina
    Henseh, Jan
    Plokker, Wim
    BUILDING SIMULATION 2007, VOLS 1-3, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, : 1799 - +
  • [47] Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis for river quality modelling
    Radwan, M
    Willems, P
    Berlamont, J
    JOURNAL OF HYDROINFORMATICS, 2004, 6 (02) : 83 - 99
  • [48] Isogeometric Analysis (IGA)-Based Topology Optimization for 3D Flexoelectric Structures
    Meng, Yao
    Yan, Xiaoye
    Zhang, Weisheng
    ACTA MECHANICA SOLIDA SINICA, 2024, 37 (04) : 580 - 589
  • [49] The role of sensitivity and uncertainty analysis in combustion modelling
    Tomlin, Alison S.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE, 2013, 34 : 159 - 176
  • [50] Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of reliability for marine structures
    Liu, DF
    Dong, S
    Wang, C
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SIXTH (1996) INTERNATIONAL OFFSHORE AND POLAR ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, VOL IV, 1996, 1996, : 380 - 386