An Early Feedback Prediction System for Learners At-Risk Within a First-Year Higher Education Course

被引:64
作者
Baneres, David [1 ,2 ]
Elena Rodriguez-Gonzalez, M. [1 ,2 ]
Serra, Montse [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oberta Catalunya, Comp Sci Multimedia & Telecommun Dept, Barcelona 08018, Spain
[2] Univ Oberta Catalunya, ELearn Ctr Dept, Barcelona 08018, Spain
来源
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES | 2019年 / 12卷 / 02期
关键词
Predictive models; at-risk student; first-year student; personalized feedback; online learning; EARLY WARNING SYSTEMS; ACADEMIC-PERFORMANCE; DROPOUT PREDICTION; LEARNING ANALYTICS; STUDENTS; ONLINE; PARTICIPATION; ACHIEVEMENT;
D O I
10.1109/TLT.2019.2912167
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Identifying at-risk students as soon as possible is a challenge in educational institutions. Decreasing the time lag between identification and real at-risk state may significantly reduce the risk of failure or disengage. In small courses, their identification is relatively easy, but it is impractical on larger ones. Current Learning Management Systems store a large amount of data that could help to generate predictive models to early identification of students in online and blended learning. The contribution of this paper is twofold: First, a new adaptive predictive model is presented based only on students' grades specifically trained for each course. A deep analysis is performed in the whole institution to evaluate its performance accuracy. Second, an early warning system is developed, focusing on dashboards visualization for stakeholders (i.e., students and teachers) and an early feedback prediction system to intervene in the case of at-risk identification. The early warning system has been evaluated in a case study on a first-year undergraduate course in computer science. We show the accuracy of the correct identification of at-risk students, the students' appraisal, and the most common factors that lead to at-risk level.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 263
页数:15
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
Arnold K.E., 2012, P 2 INT C LEARN AN K, P267, DOI [DOI 10.1145/2330601.2330666, 10.1145/2330601.2330666]
[2]  
Astin AW, 1999, J COLL STUDENT DEV, V40, P518
[3]  
Azcona D., 2015, INT J COMPUTER SCI S, V4, P218
[4]  
Baker R.S., 2009, Journal of Educational Data Mining, V1, P3
[5]  
Baneres D., 2016, P 11 INT C P2P PAR G, P935
[6]  
Bañeres D, 2018, LECT NOTE DATA ENG, V11, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-68318-8_1
[7]   Students' LMS interaction patterns and their relationship with achievement: A case study in higher education [J].
Cerezo, Rebeca ;
Sanchez-Santillan, Miguel ;
Puerto Paule-Ruiz, M. ;
Carlos Nunez, J. .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2016, 96 :42-54
[8]  
Cleveland W. S., 1992, STAT MODELS, DOI [DOI 10.1201/9780203738535, DOI 10.1201/9780203738535-8]
[9]  
DeCandia Giuseppe, 2007, Operating Systems Review, V41, P205, DOI 10.1145/1323293.1294281
[10]  
del Blanco A, 2013, IEEE GLOB ENG EDUC C, P1255, DOI 10.1109/EduCon.2013.6530268