The mythologisation of key workers: occupational prestige gained, sustained ... and lost? ...

被引:20
作者
De Camargo, Camilla R. [1 ]
Whiley, Lilith A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Kingston Univ, Sch Law Social & Behav Sci, London, England
[2] Kingston Univ, Kingston Business Sch, London, England
关键词
COVID-19; pandemic; Coronavirus pandemic; Critical worker; Essential worker; Key workers; Occupational prestige; DIRTY WORK; IDENTITY; IMAGE; MEDIA;
D O I
10.1108/IJSSP-07-2020-0310
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
Purpose Key workers are deemed "essential" for keeping the country going while the rest of us have been resigned to the safety of our homes. Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, key workers have become the exalted symbol of the pandemic; although, during pre-pandemic many of these roles were considered "low skilled" and were (and still are) low paid. Design/methodology/approach The analysis uses newspapers as data sources to discuss occupational prestige and situate it within previous theory. Findings This social commentary discusses how occupational prestige evolves and devolves during times of social change, and how elevated status, dependent on one's service to the country in the spirit of a "war-time" narrative, is just temporary and fleeting. Prestige is wrapped up in notions of class, income and education, and during the pandemic, "key workers" have become their own sub-group with an almost mythologised status and value, which the authors argue might take the focus away from genuine efforts to improve working conditions (e.g. access to PPE and pay rises etcetera). Originality/value The article considers the current value of key workers and how elevated levels of prestige are transitory. The enduring nature of this new status is yet to be seen. More qualitative nuanced research is required around how occupational prestige changes, evolves and devolves and more quantitative research on why and how widespread some of the critical issues might be.
引用
收藏
页码:849 / 859
页数:11
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   The Pursuit of Status in Social Groups [J].
Anderson, Cameron ;
Kilduff, Gavin J. .
CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2009, 18 (05) :295-298
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2020, METRO ONLINE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2020, THE MIRROR
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2020, BBC
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2020, The Sun
[6]   How can you do it?: Dirty work and the challenge of constructing a positive identity [J].
Ashforth, BE ;
Kreiner, GE .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1999, 24 (03) :413-434
[7]  
Bilton T., 1981, Introductory Sociology
[8]  
Bloom D., 2020, MIRROR ONLINE
[9]  
Broom L., 1980, INHERITANCE INEQUALI
[10]  
Colley H., 2003, J VOCAT EDUC TRAIN, V55, P471, DOI [DOI 10.1080/13636820300200240, 10.1080/13636820300200240]