A first principles investigation of electron transfer between Fe(II) and U(VI) on insulating Al- vs. semiconducting Fe-oxide surfaces via the proximity effect

被引:21
作者
Taylor, S. D. [1 ,2 ]
Marcano, M. C. [1 ]
Becker, U. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Earth & Environm Sci, 2534 CC Little Bldg,1100 North Univ Ave, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Pacific Northwest Natl Lab, Richland, WA 99352 USA
关键词
Hematite; Corundum; Surface-mediated redox reactions; Uranyl reduction; Electron transfer; HETEROGENEOUS REDUCTION; HEMATITE ALPHA-FE2O3; WATER INTERFACE; SPECTROSCOPIC EVIDENCE; CHARGE-DISTRIBUTION; MINERAL SURFACES; URANYL REDUCTION; FERROUS IRON; OXALIC-ACID; ADSORPTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.gca.2016.10.022
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
This study investigates how the intrinsic chemical and electronic properties of mineral surfaces and their associated electron transfer (ET) pathways influence the reduction of U(VI) by surface-associated Fe(II). Density functional theory (DFT), including the Hubbard U correction to the exchange-correlation functional, was used to investigate sorption/redox reactions and ET mechanisms between Fe(II) and U(VI) coadsorbed on isostructural, periodic (001) surfaces of the insulator corundum (alpha-Al2O3) vs. the semiconductor hematite (alpha-Fe2O3). Furthermore, the coadsorbed Fe(II) and U(VI) ions are spatially separated from one another on the surfaces (>= 5.9 angstrom ) to observe whether electronic-coupling through the semiconducting hematite surface facilitates ET between the adsorbates, a phenomenon known as the proximity effect. The calculations show that the different chemical and electronic properties between the isostructural corundum and hematite (001) surfaces lead to considerably different ET mechanisms between Fe(II) and U(VI). ET on the insulating corundum (001) surface is limited by the adsorbates' structural configuration. When Fe(II) and U(VI) are spatially separated and do not directly interact with one another (e.g. via an inner-sphere complex), U(VI) reduction by Fe(II) cannot occur as there is no physical pathway enabling ET between the adsorbates. In contrast to the insulating corundum (001) surface, the hematite (001) surface can potentially participate in ET reactions due to the high number of electron acceptor sites from the Fe d-states near the Fermi level at the hematite surface. The adsorption of Fe(II) also introduces d-states near the Fermi level as well as shifts unoccupied d-states of the Fe cations at the hematite surface to lower energies, making the surface more conductive. In turn, electronic coupling through the surface can link the spatially separated adsorbates to one another and provide distinct ET pathways for an electron from Fe(II) to travel through the hematite surface and reach U(VI). The progression and extent of ET occurring on the semiconducting hematite (001) surface via the proximity effect depends on the electronic properties of the surface. ET between the spatially separated U(VI) and Fe(II) occurs most readily when orbitals between the Fe and U adsorbates overlap with those of neighboring O and Fe ions at the hematite surface, as shown by calculations without the Hubbard U correction. Analyses of the spins densities confirm that the U and Fe adsorbates were reduced and oxidized, respectively, (acquiring 0.33 mu(B) and 0.11-0.20 mu(B), respectively), while Fe cations at the hematite surface were reduced (losing <= 0.6 mu(B)). If electrons are highly localized, the amount of orbital mixing and electronic coupling through the hematite surface decreases and in turn leads to a lower degree of spin transfer, as predicted by calculations with the Hubbard U correction. Thus, the proximity effect is a potential mechanism on semiconducting surfaces facilitating surface-mediated redox reactions, although its significance varies depending on the electronic properties and subsequent charge-carrying ability of the surface. These results provide insight into ET pathways and mechanisms on insulating Al- and semi-conducting Fe oxide surfaces influencing the reduction U(VI) by Fe(II) that may subsequently limit uranium's transport in the subsurface. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:305 / 322
页数:18
相关论文
共 97 条
[1]  
Aboud S., 2011, Phys. Rev. B, V83
[2]   Ab initio modeling of Fe(II) adsorption and interfacial electron transfer at goethite (α-FeOOH) surfaces [J].
Alexandrov, Vitaly ;
Rosso, Kevin M. .
PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 17 (22) :14518-14531
[3]   Electron Exchange and Conduction in Nontronite from First-Principles [J].
Alexandrov, Vitaly ;
Neumann, Anke ;
Scherer, Michelle M. ;
Rosso, Kevin M. .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C, 2013, 117 (05) :2032-2040
[4]   BAND THEORY AND MOTT INSULATORS - HUBBARD-U INSTEAD OF STONER-I [J].
ANISIMOV, VI ;
ZAANEN, J ;
ANDERSEN, OK .
PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 1991, 44 (03) :943-954
[5]   Spectroscopic confirmation of uranium(VI)-carbonato adsorption complexes on hematite [J].
Bargar, JR ;
Reitmeyer, R ;
Davis, JA .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 33 (14) :2481-2484
[6]  
Becker U, 1996, AM MINERAL, V81, P1301
[7]   The proximity effect on semiconducting mineral surfaces: A new aspect of mineral surface reactivity and surface complexation theory? [J].
Becker, U ;
Rosso, KM ;
Hochella, MF .
GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA, 2001, 65 (16) :2641-2649
[8]   Adsorption of Fe(II) and U(VI) to carboxyl-functionalized microspheres: The influence of speciation on uranyl reduction studied by titration and XAFS [J].
Boyanov, Maxim I. ;
O'Loughlin, Edward J. ;
Roden, Eric E. ;
Fein, Jeremy B. ;
Kemner, Kenneth M. .
GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA, 2007, 71 (08) :1898-1912
[9]   Metal oxide surfaces and their interactions with aqueous solutions and microbial organisms [J].
Brown, GE ;
Henrich, VE ;
Casey, WH ;
Clark, DL ;
Eggleston, C ;
Felmy, A ;
Goodman, DW ;
Grätzel, M ;
Maciel, G ;
McCarthy, MI ;
Nealson, KH ;
Sverjensky, DA ;
Toney, MF ;
Zachara, JM .
CHEMICAL REVIEWS, 1999, 99 (01) :77-174
[10]   MINERAL-AQUEOUS SOLUTION INTERFACES AND THEIR IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT [J].
Brown, Gordon E., Jr. ;
Calas, Georges .
GEOCHEMICAL PERSPECTIVES, 2012, 1 (4-5) :483-742