The prevalence and locations of bone metastases using whole-body MRI in treatment-naive intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer

被引:14
|
作者
Ottosson, Fredrik [1 ]
Baco, Eduard [1 ]
Lauritzen, Peter M. [2 ]
Rud, Erik [2 ]
机构
[1] Oslo Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Oslo, Norway
[2] Oslo Univ Hosp, Div Radiol & Nucl Med, Postboks 4959, N-0424 Oslo, Norway
关键词
Prostatic neoplasm; Neoplasms metastases; Magnetic resonance imaging; Risk assessment; LOCAL TREATMENT; WB-MRI; GUIDELINES; DIAGNOSIS; SCINTIGRAPHY; SPECIMENS; PATTERNS; BIOPSIES; SPREAD; SCANS;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-020-07363-x
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence and distribution of bone metastases in treatment-naive prostate cancer patients eligible for a metastatic workup using whole-body MRI, and to evaluate the results in light of current guidelines. Methods This single-institution, retrospective study included all patients with treatment-naive prostate cancer referred to whole-body MRI during 2016 and 2017. All were eligible for a metastatic workup according to the guidelines: PSA > 20 ng/ml and/or Gleason grade group >= 3 and/or cT >= 2c and/or bone symptoms. The definition of a metastasis was descriptive and based on the original MRI reports. The anatomical location of metastases was registered. Results We included 161 patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer of which 36 (22%) were intermediate-risk and 125 (78%) were high-risk. The median age and PSA were 71 years (IQR 64-76) and 13 ng/ml (IQR 8-28), respectively. Bone metastases were found in 12 patients (7%, 95% CI: 4-13), and all were high-risk with Gleason grade group >= 4. The pelvis was affected in 4 patients, and the spine + pelvis in the remaining 8. No patients demonstrated metastases to the spine without concomitant metastases in the pelvis. Limitations are the small number of metastases and retrospective design. Conclusion This study suggests that the overall prevalence of bone metastases using the current guidelines for screening is quite low. No metastases were seen in the case of Gleason grade group <= 3, and further studies should investigate if it necessary to screen non-high-risk patients.
引用
收藏
页码:2747 / 2753
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Clinical value of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/MRI in primary staging of patients with intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer
    Ali, Ismail
    Rezk, Mahmoud
    Hamouda, Dalia
    Talaat, Omnia
    Omar, Yehia
    Abdel Tawab, Mohamed
    Nasr, Ibrahim
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2024, 97 (1155) : 622 - 631
  • [12] Value of PHI and PHID in the detection of intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer
    Filella, Xavier
    Foj, Laura
    Wijngaard, Robin
    Luque, Pilar
    CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2022, 531 : 277 - 282
  • [13] 18F-Fluoromethylcholine-positron emission tomography/computed tomography for diagnosing bone and lymph node metastases in patients with intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer
    Mortensen, Mike Allan
    Poulsen, Mads Hvid
    Gerke, Oke
    Jakobsen, Jorn Skibsted
    Hoilund-Carlsen, Poul Flemming
    Lund, Lars
    PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 7 (03) : 119 - 123
  • [14] Whole-Body Diffusion-Weighted MRI Compared With 18F-NaF PET/CT for Detection of Bone Metastases in Patients With High-Risk Prostate Carcinoma
    Mosavi, Firas
    Johansson, Silvia
    Sandberg, Dan T.
    Turesson, Ingela
    Sorensen, Jens
    Ahlstrom, Hakan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2012, 199 (05) : 1114 - 1120
  • [15] Whole-Body MRI vs. PET/CT for the Detection of Bone Metastases in Patients With Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zhan, Yuefu
    Zhang, Guangming
    Li, Mingliang
    Zhou, Xiaobo
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [16] Is Radical Perineal Prostatectomy a Viable Therapeutic Option for Intermediate- and High-risk Prostate Cancer?
    Lee, Hye Won
    Jeon, Hwang Gyun
    Jeong, Byong Chang
    Seo, Seong Il
    Jeon, Seong Soo
    Lee, Hyun Moo
    Choi, Han Yong
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2015, 30 (11) : 1631 - 1637
  • [17] Value of baseline and follow-up whole-body bone scans in detecting bone metastasis in high-risk breast cancer patients
    Al-Muqbel, Kusai M.
    Yaghan, Rami J.
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2013, 34 (06) : 577 - 581
  • [18] Quantitative imaging parameters to predict the local staging of prostate cancer in intermediate- to high-risk patients
    Laudicella, Riccardo
    Skawran, Stephan
    Ferraro, Daniela A.
    Muhlematter, Urs J.
    Maurer, Alexander
    Grunig, Hannes
    Ruschoff, Hendrik J.
    Rupp, Niels
    Donati, Olivio
    Eberli, Daniel
    Burger, Irene A.
    INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING, 2022, 13 (01)
  • [19] Can Whole-body Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Diffusion-weighted Imaging Replace Tc 99m Bone Scanning and Computed Tomography for Single-step Detection of Metastases in Patients with High-risk Prostate Cancer?
    Lecouvet, Frederic E.
    El Mouedden, Jawad
    Collette, Laurence
    Coche, Emmanuel
    Danse, Etienne
    Jamar, Francois
    Machiels, Jean-Pascal
    Vande Berg, Bruno
    Omoumi, Patrick
    Tombal, Bertrand
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2012, 62 (01) : 68 - 75
  • [20] Comparison of bone lesion distribution between prostate cancer and multiple myeloma with whole-body MRI
    Larbi, A.
    Omoumi, P.
    Pasoglou, V
    Michoux, N.
    Triqueneaux, P.
    Tombal, B.
    Cyteval, C.
    Lecouvet, F. E.
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING, 2019, 100 (05) : 295 - 302