RETRACTED: The value of an albumin-based intravascular volume replacement strategy in elderly patients undergoing major abdominal surgery (Retracted Article)

被引:41
作者
Boldt, Joachim [1 ]
Schoelhorn, Thilo [1 ]
Mayer, Jochen [1 ]
Piper, Sven [1 ]
Suttner, Stefan [1 ]
机构
[1] Klinikum Stadt Ludwigshafen, Clin Anesthesiol & Intens Care Med, D-67063 Ludwigshafen, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1213/01.ane.0000221179.07006.06
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
The value of human albumin (HA) for treating hypovolemia is controversial. Less expensive alternatives such as hydroxyethyl starch (HES) are sometimes refused because of unwanted side effects. We prospectively randomized 50 patients older than 70 years old undergoing major abdominal surgery to receive either 5% HA (n = 25) or a third generation HES preparation (6% HES 130/0.4; n = 25) when mean arterial blood pressure was < 60 mm Hg and central venous pressure was < 10 mm Hg. Hemodynamics, inflammation (interleukin-6), endothelial activation-integrity (adhesion molecules), coagulation (thrombelastography), and renal function (including kidney-specific proteins) were monitored after the induction of anesthesia, after surgery, 5 h in the intensive care unit, and on the first postoperative day. HA patients received 3960 +/- 590 mL of HA and 5070 +/- 1030 mL of Ringer's lactate solution, and HES patients received 3500 +/- 530 mL of HES and 4550 +/- 880 mL of Ringer's lactate solution. Total protein remained normal only in the HA-treated patients. No significant differences (P > 0.1) between the groups were seen with regard to hemodynamics, coagulation, and kidney function. Plasma levels of interleukin-6 and soluble adhesion molecules were significantly (P < 0.05) higher in the HA- than in the HES-treated patients. We conclude that HA in elderly patients undergoing major abdominal surgery can easily be replaced by a modern HES preparation. Because of the decreased inflammatory response and endothelial activation-injury, HES 130/0.4 seems to be the more appropriate fluid strategy for these patients.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 199
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] THE EFFECT OF HYDROXYETHYL STARCH AND OTHER PLASMA-VOLUME SUBSTITUTES ON ENDOTHELIAL-CELL ACTIVATION - AN IN-VITRO STUDY
    COLLIS, RE
    COLLINS, PW
    GUTTERIDGE, CN
    KAUL, A
    NEWLAND, AC
    WILLIAMS, DM
    WEBB, AR
    [J]. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 1994, 20 (01) : 37 - 41
  • [2] Unrecognized renal damage in critically ill patients
    Dehne, MG
    Mühling, J
    Papke, G
    Nopens, H
    Kuntzsch, U
    Hempelmann, G
    [J]. RENAL FAILURE, 1999, 21 (06) : 695 - 706
  • [3] Finfer S, 2004, NEW ENGL J MED, V350, P2247
  • [4] Plasma and urinary cytokine homeostasis and renal dysfunction during cardiac surgery
    Gormley, SMC
    McBride, WT
    Armstrong, MA
    Young, IS
    McClean, E
    MacGowan, SW
    Campalani, G
    McMurray, TJ
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2000, 93 (05) : 1210 - 1216
  • [5] Groeneveld ABJ, 2000, CRIT CARE, V4, pS16
  • [6] Why the food and drug administration changed the warning label for hetastarch
    Haynes, GR
    Havidich, JE
    Payne, KJ
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2004, 101 (02) : 560 - 561
  • [7] Albumin administration - what is the evidence of clinical benefit? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials
    Haynes, GR
    Navickis, RJ
    Wilkes, MM
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2003, 20 (10) : 771 - 793
  • [8] Early multiple organ failure after recurrent endotoxemia in the presence of vasoconstrictor-masked hypovolemia
    Hinder, F
    Stubbe, HD
    Van Aken, H
    Baba, HA
    Jahn, UR
    Brodner, G
    August, C
    Erren, M
    Booke, M
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2003, 31 (03) : 903 - 909
  • [9] Hydroxyethyl starch (130 kD), but not crystalloid volume support, improves microcirculation during normotensive endotoxemia
    Hoffmann, JN
    Vollmar, B
    Laschke, MW
    Inthorn, D
    Schildberg, FW
    Menger, MD
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2002, 97 (02) : 460 - 470
  • [10] Effects of hydroxyethyl starch solutions on hemostasis
    Kozek-Langenecker, SA
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2005, 103 (03) : 654 - 660