CT planning studies for robotic total knee arthroplasty WHAT DOES IT COST AND DOES IT REQUIRE A FORMAL RADIOLOGIST REPORTING?

被引:16
作者
Abdelfadeel, W. [1 ]
Houston, N. [1 ]
Star, A. [1 ]
Saxena, A. [1 ]
Horack, W. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Rothman Orthopaed Inst, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
关键词
COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; COMMUNICATION; PHYSICIAN;
D O I
10.1302/0301-620X.102B6.BJJ-2019-1498.R1
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims The aim of this study was to analyze the true costs associated with preoperative CT scans performed for robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RATKA) planning and to determine the value of a formal radiologist's report of these studies. Methods We reviewed 194 CT reports of 176 sequential patients who underwent primary RATKA by a single surgeon at a suburban teaching hospital. CT radiology reports were reviewed for the presence of incidental findings that might change the management of the patient. Payments for the scans, including the technical and professional components, for 330 patients at two hospitals were also recorded and compared. Results There were 82 incidental findings in 61 CT studies, one of which led to a recommendation for additional testing. Across both institutions, the mean total payment for a preoperative scan was $446 ($8 to $3,870). The mean patient payment was $71 ($0 to $2,690). There was wide variation in payments between the institutions. In Institution A, the mean total payment was $258 ($168 to $264), with a mean patient payment of $57 ($0 to $100). The mean technical payment in this institution was $211 ($8 to $856), while the mean professional payment was $48 ($0 to $66). In Institution B, the mean total payment was $636 ($37 to $3,870), with a mean patient payment of $85 ($0 to $2,690). Conclusion The total cost of a CT scan is low and a minimal part of the overall cost of the RATKA. No incidental findings identified on imaging led to a change in management, suggesting that the professional component could be eliminated to reduce costs. Further studies need to take into account the patient perspective and the wide variation in total costs and patient payments across institutions and insurances.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 84
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[11]   Pros and Cons: A Balanced View of Robotics in Knee Arthroplasty [J].
Lonner, Jess H. ;
Fillingham, Yale A. .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2018, 33 (07) :2007-2013
[12]   Recent and Future Directions in CT Imaging [J].
Pelc, Norbert J. .
ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2014, 42 (02) :260-268
[13]   Preoperative Mapping in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Using Computed Tomography Scans Is Associated with Radiation Exposure and Carries High Cost [J].
Ponzio, Danielle Y. ;
Lonner, Jess H. .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2015, 30 (06) :964-967
[14]   The Learning Curve Associated with Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty [J].
Sodhi, Nipun ;
Khlopas, Anton ;
Piuzzi, Nicolas S. ;
Sultan, Assem A. ;
Marchand, Robert C. ;
Malkani, Arthur L. ;
Mont, Michael A. .
JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2018, 31 (01) :17-21
[15]  
Swank Michael L, 2009, Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ), V38, P32
[16]   Study Of Physician And Patient Communication Identifies Missed Opportunities To Help Reduce Patients' Out-Of-Pocket Spending [J].
Ubel, Peter A. ;
Zhang, Cecilia J. ;
Hesson, Ashley ;
Davis, J. Kelly ;
Kirby, Christine ;
Barnett, Jamison ;
Hunter, Wynn G. .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2016, 35 (04) :654-661