Safety and Efficacy of Damage Control External Fixation Versus Early Definitive Stabilization for Femoral Shaft Fractures in the Multiple-Injured Patient

被引:77
|
作者
Tuttle, Mark S. [1 ]
Smith, Wade R. [1 ]
Williams, Allison E. [1 ]
Agudelo, Juan F. [1 ]
Hartshorn, Cody J. [1 ]
Moore, Ernest E. [1 ]
Morgan, Steven J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Hlth Sci Ctr, Denver Hlth Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Denver, CO 80204 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE | 2009年 / 67卷 / 03期
关键词
Damage control orthopedics; External fixation; Femur; Fracture; RESPIRATORY-DISTRESS-SYNDROME; FEMUR FRACTURES; THORACIC TRAUMA; HEAD-INJURIES;
D O I
10.1097/TA.0b013e3181aa21c0
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Optimal timing and treatment of patients with concomitant head, thoracic, or abdominal injury and femoral shaft fracture remain controversial. This study examines acute patient outcomes associated with early total care with intramedullary nailing (ETC group) versus damage control external fixation (DCO group) for multiple-injured patients with femoral shaft fractures. We propose DCO as a safe initial treatment for the multiple-injured patient with femur shaft fractures. Methods: This study was a retrospective review of the trauma registry and multisystem organ failure registry data at a Level I trauma center. Two cohorts were identified to compare multiple-injured patients with femoral shaft fractures treated with early total care and damage control orthopaedic surgery. Primary outcome measures included mortality, pulmonary complications (adult respiratory distress syndrome [ARDS] score), transfusion requirements, and multiple organ failure (MOF score). Operative time estimated blood loss, intensive care unit length of stay (LOS), and hospital length of stay (LOS) were also compared. Results: During the study period, 462 patients with 481 femoral shaft fractures were identified. Of 462 patients with femoral shaft fractures, 97 met the inclusion criteria (42 ETC and 55 DCO). The DCO group had a significantly shorter operative time (22 minutes vs. 125 minutes) and less estimated blood loss from their operative procedure (37 mL vs. 330 mL). There was no significant difference between the groups for ARDS, lung scores, MOF, MOF score, intensive care unit LOS, or hospital LOS. Conclusion: Fracture fixation method did not have an impact on the incidence of systemic complications in multiple-injured patients with femoral shaft fractures. Although minimal differences were noted between DCO and ETC groups regarding systemic complications, DCO is a safer initial approach, significantly decreasing the initial operative exposure and blood loss.
引用
收藏
页码:602 / 605
页数:4
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Early definitive stabilization versus damage control orthopaedics for femur shaft fractures in the multiply injured patient
    S Morgan
    M Tuttle
    W Smith
    C Hartshorn
    D Ciesla
    A Williams
    E Moore
    Critical Care, 9 (Suppl 1):
  • [2] Femoral fractures in the polytrauma patient Early fracture fixation versus damage control orthopedics
    Ian Harris
    David L. Helfet
    James F. Kellam
    中华创伤骨科杂志, 2005, (02) : 59 - 62
  • [3] Skeletal Traction Versus External Fixation in the Initial Temporization of Femoral Shaft Fractures in Severely Injured Patients
    Scannell, Brian P.
    Waldrop, Norman E.
    Sasser, Howell C.
    Sing, Ronald F.
    Bosse, Michael J.
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2010, 68 (03): : 633 - 638
  • [4] PLATE FIXATION OF FEMORAL-SHAFT FRACTURES IN MULTIPLE INJURED CHILDREN
    KREGOR, PJ
    SONG, KM
    ROUTT, MLC
    SANGEORZAN, BJ
    LIDDELL, RM
    HANSEN, ST
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1993, 75A (12): : 1774 - 1780
  • [5] Early complications with external fixation of pediatric femoral shaft fractures
    Gregory, P
    Pevny, T
    Teague, D
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 1996, 10 (03) : 191 - 198
  • [6] Skeletal Traction Versus External Fixation in the Initial Temporization of Femoral Shaft Fractures in Severely Injured Patients DISCUSSION
    Balogh, Zsolt J.
    Wiles, Charles E., III
    Mullins, Richard
    Bosse, Michael J.
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2010, 68 (03): : 638 - 639
  • [7] External fixation as definitive treatment or external fixation followed by early fixation in open fractures of the tibial shaft: A descriptive study
    Le Baron, Marie
    Maman, Pascal
    Volpi, Richard
    Flecher, Xavier
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2024, 55
  • [8] Skeletal Traction Versus External Fixation in the Initial Temporization of Femoral Shaft Fractures in Severely Injured Patients EDITORIAL COMMENT
    Balogh, Zsolt J.
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2010, 68 (03): : 639 - 640
  • [9] Choice of initial or definitive stabilization of femoral shaft fractures was affected by patient clinical status
    Meek, Robert N.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2008, 90A (05): : 1173 - 1173
  • [10] Safety and Efficacy of Conversion from External Fixation to Plate Fixation in Humeral Shaft Fractures
    Suzuki, Takashi
    Hak, David J.
    Stahel, Philip F.
    Morgan, Steven J.
    Smith, Wade R.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2010, 24 (07) : 414 - 419