A Bayesian Meta-analysis Method for Estimating Risk Difference of Rare Events

被引:5
|
作者
Tang, Yuanyuan [1 ]
Tang, Qi [2 ]
Yu, Yao [3 ]
Wen, Shihua [4 ]
机构
[1] Sain Lukes Hlth Syst, St Lukes Hosp Kansas City, St Lukes Mid Amer Heart Inst, Cardiovasc Res, Kansas City, MO USA
[2] Sanofi, Translat Informat, Bridgewater, NJ 08807 USA
[3] AbbVie Inc, Data & Stat Sci, N Chicago, IL USA
[4] Novartis Pharmaceut, Global Biostat, E Hanover, NJ USA
关键词
Bayesian; meta-analysis; rare event; risk difference; 2; X-2; TABLES; CONTINUITY CORRECTION; CLINICAL-TRIALS; RELATIVE RISK; SPARSE DATA; 2X2;
D O I
10.1080/10543406.2017.1372767
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Bayesian meta-analysis has been more frequently utilized for synthesizing safety and efficacy information to support landmark decision-making due to its flexibility of incorporating prior information and availability of computing software. However, when the outcome is binary and the events are rare, where event counts can be zero, conventional meta-analysis methods including Bayesian methods may not work well. Several methods have been proposed to tackle this issue but the prior knowledge of event rate was not utilized to increase precision of risk difference estimates. To better estimate risk differences, we propose a new Bayesian method, Beta prior BInomial model for Risk Differences (B-BIRD), which takes into account the prior information of rare events. B-BIRD is illustrated using a real data set of 48 clinical trials about a type 2 diabetes drug. In simulation studies, it performs well in low event rate settings.
引用
收藏
页码:550 / 561
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comments on "A Bayesian meta-analysis method for estimating risk difference of rare events"
    Holzhauer, Bjoern
    Glimm, Ekkehard
    JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2018, 28 (05) : 1015 - 1017
  • [2] Accurate confidence intervals for risk difference in meta-analysis with rare events
    Jiang, Tao
    Cao, Baixin
    Shan, Guogen
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [3] Accurate confidence intervals for risk difference in meta-analysis with rare events
    Tao Jiang
    Baixin Cao
    Guogen Shan
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 20
  • [4] Meta-analysis methods for risk difference: A comparison of different models
    Guo, Juanru
    Xiao, Mengli
    Chu, Haitao
    Lin, Lifeng
    STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2023, 32 (01) : 3 - 21
  • [5] Meta-analysis of rare adverse events in randomized clinical trials: Bayesian and frequentist methods
    Hong, Hwanhee
    Wang, Chenguang
    Rosner, Gary L.
    CLINICAL TRIALS, 2021, 18 (01) : 3 - 16
  • [6] Investigating heterogeneity in meta-analysis of studies with rare events Estimating the amount of heterogeneity
    Bohning, Dankmar
    Holling, Heinz
    Boehning, Walailuck
    Sangnawakij, Patarawan
    METRON-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STATISTICS, 2021, 79 (03): : 259 - 272
  • [7] Estimating risk difference from relative association measures in meta-analysis can infrequently pose interpretational challenges
    Murad, Mohammad Hassan
    Montori, Victor M.
    Walter, Stephen D.
    Guyatt, Gordon H.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2009, 62 (08) : 865 - 867
  • [8] Meta-analysis of incidence of rare events
    Lane, Peter W.
    STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2013, 22 (02) : 117 - 132
  • [9] Comparison of random-effects meta-analysis models for the relative risk in the case of rare events: A simulation study
    Beisemann, Marie
    Doebler, Philipp
    Holling, Heinz
    BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 62 (07) : 1597 - 1630
  • [10] Bayesian Estimation and Testing in Random Effects Meta-Analysis of Rare Binary Adverse Events
    Bai, Ou
    Chen, Min
    Wang, Xinlei
    STATISTICS IN BIOPHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2016, 8 (01): : 49 - 59