Lower uterine segment thickness measurement in pregnant women with previous Cesarean section: reliability analysis using two- and three-dimensional transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound

被引:46
作者
Martins, W. P. [1 ]
Barra, D. A.
Gallarreta, F. M. P.
Nastri, C. O.
Filho, F. M.
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Med Ribeirao Preto, Dept Obstet & Ginecol, BR-14049900 Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
Cesarean section; reproducibility of results; three-dimensional; ultrasonography; uterine rupture; ULTRASONOGRAPHIC EVALUATION; SONOGRAPHIC MEASUREMENT; CLINICAL METHODS; VAGINAL BIRTH; RUPTURE; VALIDITY; LABOR; INTRAOBSERVER; MANAGEMENT; DELIVERY;
D O I
10.1002/uog.6224
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objective To evaluate the reliability of two- and three-dimensional ultrasonographic measurement of the thickness of the lower uterine segment (LUS) in pregnant women by transvaginal and transabdominal approaches. Methods This was a study of 30 pregnant women who bad bad at least one previous Cesarean section and were between 36 and 39 weeks' gestation, with singleton pregnancies in cephalic presentation. Sonographic examinations were performed by two observers using both 4-7-MHz transabdominal and 5-8-MHz transvaginal volumetric probes. LUS measurements were performed using two- and three-dimensional ultrasound, evaluating the entire LUS thickness transabdominally and the LUS muscular thickness transvaginally. Each observer measured the LUS four times by each method. Reliability was analyzed by comparing the mean of the absolute differences, the intraclass correlation coefficients, the 95% limits of agreement and the proportion of differences <1 mm. Results Transvaginal ultrasound provided greater reliability in LUS measurements than did transabdominal ultrasound. The use of three-dimensional ultrasound improved significantly the reliability of the LUS muscular thickness measurement obtained transvaginally. Conclusions Ultrasonographic measurement of the LUS muscular thickness transvaginally appears more reliable than does that of the entire LUS thickness transabdominally. The use of three-dimensional ultrasound should be considered to improve measurement reliability. Copyright (c) 2009 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 306
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, JAMA, V284, P3043
[2]  
Asakura Hirobumi, 2000, Journal of Nippon Medical School, V67, P352, DOI 10.1272/jnms.67.352
[3]   INTRACLASS CORRELATION COEFFICIENT AS A MEASURE OF RELIABILITY [J].
BARTKO, JJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1966, 19 (01) :3-&
[4]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[5]   Maternal and perinatal complications with uterine rupture in 142,075 patients who attempted vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: A review of the literature [J].
Chauhan, SP ;
Martin, JN ;
Henrichs, CE ;
Morrison, JC ;
Magann, EF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 189 (02) :408-417
[6]   Sonographic Measurement of the Lower Uterine Segment Thickness in Women With Previous Caesarean Section [J].
Cheung, Vincent Y. T. .
JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2005, 27 (07) :674-681
[7]   Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of ultrasound measurements of endometrial thickness in postmenopausal women [J].
Epstein, E ;
Valentin, L .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 20 (05) :486-491
[8]   The reliability and validity of three dimensional ultrasound volumetric measurements using an in vitro balloon and in vivo uterine model [J].
Farrell, T ;
Leslie, JR ;
Chien, PFW ;
Agustsson, P .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2001, 108 (06) :573-582
[9]   ULTRASOUND EXAMINATION OF CESAREAN-SECTION SCARS DURING PREGNANCY [J].
FUKUDA, M ;
SHIMIZU, T ;
IHARA, Y ;
FUKUDA, K ;
NATSUYAMA, E ;
MOCHIZUKI, M .
ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 1991, 248 (03) :129-138
[10]   Predicting incomplete uterine rupture with vaginal sonography during the late second trimester in women with prior cesarean [J].
Gotoh, H ;
Masuzaki, H ;
Yoshida, A ;
Yoshimura, S ;
Miyamura, T ;
Ishimaru, T .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 95 (04) :596-600