Environmental assessment of bioethanol from onshore grown green seaweed

被引:23
作者
Brockmann, Doris [1 ,2 ]
Pradinaud, Charlotte [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Champenois, Jennifer [4 ]
Benoit, Maud [4 ]
Helias, Arnaud [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] INRA, Lab Biotechnol Environm, F-11100 Narbonne, France
[2] ELSA, Montpellier, France
[3] Montpellier SupAgro, Montpellier, France
[4] CEVA, Pleubian, France
来源
BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR | 2015年 / 9卷 / 06期
关键词
bioethanol; environmental assessment; LCA; seaweed; allocation; substitution; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; USE IMPACT CATEGORY; MARINE MACROALGAE; BIOMASS YIELD; ENERGY; MICROALGAE;
D O I
10.1002/bbb.1577
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Algae are an attractive, alternative renewable source for biofuel production compared to biomass from food crops or cellulosic materials. Marine algae do not need fresh water or arable land and, thus, production of marine algae does not compete with food production. In contrast to biofuel production from microalgae, the use of macroalgal biomass as feedstock for biofuel production is still in its infancy. This study presents an environmental assessment of bioethanol from onshore grown green seaweed using the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology. The environmental assessment is based on data from literature and initial laboratory scale experiments, as industrial scale facilities for bioethanol production from macroalgae do not exist. Alternative systems are compared to the reference system and the limits of the LCA are discussed with respect to the co-product management (allocation vs. substitution) in the LCA model. Impact assessment results showed that nutrients for seaweed growth and electricity consumption by the culture system were the main contributors to the environmental burdens of the reference system. Bioethanol from onshore cultivated green seaweed turned out to be an environmentally efficient biofuel compared to fossil fuel and bioethanol from sugarcane. The type of co-product management selected in LCA largely affected the impact assessment results. (C) 2015 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
引用
收藏
页码:696 / 708
页数:13
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Life cycle assessment of macroalgae cultivation and processing for biofuel production
    Aitken, Douglas
    Bulboa, Cristian
    Godoy-Faundez, Alex
    Turrion-Gomez, Juan L.
    Antizar-Ladislao, Blanca
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2014, 75 : 45 - 56
  • [2] Life cycle assessment of biofuel production from brown seaweed in Nordic conditions
    Alvarado-Morales, Merlin
    Boldrin, Alessio
    Karakashev, Dimitar B.
    Holdt, Susan L.
    Angelidaki, Irini
    Astrup, Thomas
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 129 : 92 - 99
  • [3] Andersen R A, 2005, ALGAL CULTURING TECH
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2006, Environmental management - Life cycle assessment, P54, DOI DOI 10.1136/BMJ.332.7555.1418
  • [5] Utilization of macro-algae for enhanced CO2 fixation and biofuels production:: Development of a computing software for an LCA study
    Aresta, M
    Dibenedetto, A
    Barberio, G
    [J]. FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 86 (14-15) : 1679 - 1693
  • [6] Bioenergy potential of Ulva lactuca: Biomass yield, methane production and combustion
    Bruhn, Annette
    Dahl, Jonas
    Nielsen, Henrik Bangso
    Nikolaisen, Lars
    Rasmussen, Michael Bo
    Markager, Stiig
    Olesen, Birgit
    Arias, Carlos
    Jensen, Peter Daugbjerg
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 102 (03) : 2595 - 2604
  • [7] European Commission Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability, 2011, ILCD HDB
  • [8] Quantitative Measurement of Direct Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Microalgae Cultivation
    Fagerstone, Kelly D.
    Quinn, Jason C.
    Bradley, Thomas H.
    De Long, Susan K.
    Marchese, Anthony J.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 45 (21) : 9449 - 9456
  • [9] Frischknecht R., 2007, OVERVIEW METHODOLOGY
  • [10] USE OF MACROALGAE FOR MARINE BIOMASS PRODUCTION AND CO2 REMEDIATION - A REVIEW
    GAO, K
    MCKINLEY, KR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYCOLOGY, 1994, 6 (01) : 45 - 60