Study of the Competitiveness of Quanzhou Port on the Belt and Road in China Based on a Fuzzy-AHP and ELECTRE III Model

被引:29
作者
Gao, Tielin [1 ]
Na, Sanggyun [1 ]
Dang, Xiaohan [1 ]
Zhang, Yongli [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Wonkwang Univ, Sch Business Adm, 460 Iksandae Ro, Iksan 54538, Jeonbuk, South Korea
[2] Hebei GEO Univ, Sch Management Sci & Engn, Shijiazhuang 050031, Hebei, Peoples R China
关键词
port competitiveness; fuzzy-AHP; ELECTRE III; Belt and Road; Quanzhou Port; SERVICE QUALITY; SYSTEM; KOREA; ENVIRONMENT; FRAMEWORK; SELECTION; SHANGHAI; TOPSIS;
D O I
10.3390/su10041253
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
With the establishment of the Belt and Road national strategy, Quanzhou Port is a significant development opportunity. Quanzhou Port is the origin of the 21st century Maritime Silk Road and part of the Belt and Road, but as a pioneer project of the Maritime Silk Road and the main port in the Belt and Road strategy, its development has encountered some challenges and problems. Hence, this paper aims to evaluate the competitiveness of Quanzhou Port based on the criteria selected by experts and corresponding improvement suggestions are put forward for its weaknesses. Using fuzzy-AHP and ELECTRE III, port competitiveness is evaluated according to the total weights obtained based on the different criteria used. The key criteria consist of six factors (port size, port location, hinterland economy, port costs, operations management and growth potential) that are divided into 18 sub-criteria. Five competing ports were selected with respect to geographical proximity. The order of ranking according to ELECTRE III are as follows: Kaohsiung Port, Xiamen Port, Fuzhou Port, Taichug Port and Quanzhou Port. The findings show that the port of Quanzhou appears last in the ordering sequence, resulting in a need for integrative approaches to promote its competitiveness. Compared with competitive ports, Quanzhou Port has relatively weak overall infrastructure and relatively high port costs, which leads to a lack of obvious flow of port materials and a decrease in professional unloading services. Particularly in hinterland port economies, the industrial structure is extensive and backward. Hence, the question of how to achieve a green transformation of the manufacturing industry will be important for Quanzhou Port. This paper points out directions for the future development of Quanzhou Port and applies comprehensive evaluation methods, namely fuzzy-AHP and ELECTRE III.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   A Study on the Securement of the Competitiveness of Gyeong-In Port [J].
Ahn, Woo-chul ;
Lee, Choong-hyo ;
Han, Jong-khil .
ASIAN JOURNAL OF SHIPPING AND LOGISTICS, 2014, 30 (02) :243-264
[2]  
[Anonymous], TRANSP RES E
[3]   Application of Fuzzy AHP and ELECTRE to China Dry Port Location Selection [J].
Bian, K. A. .
ASIAN JOURNAL OF SHIPPING AND LOGISTICS, 2011, 27 (02) :331-353
[4]   Multi-criteria ELECTRE method and destination competitiveness [J].
Botti, Laurent ;
Peypoch, Nicolas .
TOURISM MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES, 2013, 6 :108-113
[5]  
Casarini N., 2015, I AFFARI INTERNAZION, V15, P40
[7]   Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP [J].
Chang, DY .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1996, 95 (03) :649-655
[8]   A comparative analysis of the ports of Incheon and Shanghai: The cognitive service quality of ports, customer satisfaction, and post-behaviour [J].
Cho, Chul-Ho ;
Kim, Byung-Il ;
Hyun, Jae-Hoon .
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2010, 21 (09) :919-930
[9]   A robust ranking method extending ELECTRE III to hierarchy of interacting criteria, imprecise weights and stochastic analysis [J].
Corrente, Salvatore ;
Figueira, Jose Rui ;
Greco, Salvatore ;
Slowinski, Roman .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2017, 73 :1-17
[10]   Does One Belt One Road initiative promote Chinese overseas direct investment? [J].
Du, Julan ;
Zhang, Yifei .
CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2018, 47 :189-205