Review of computerized clinical decision support in community pharmacy

被引:43
|
作者
Curtain, C. [1 ,2 ]
Peterson, G. M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tasmania, Sch Med, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia
[2] Univ Tasmania, Unit Medicat Outcomes Res & Educ, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia
关键词
community pharmacy; computerized decision support systems; medication; pharmacists; prescribing; IMPROVE PRESCRIBING SAFETY; DRUG-INTERACTION ALERTS; DISPENSING SOFTWARE; PATIENT OUTCOMES; PRACTITIONER PERFORMANCE; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; SYSTEMS; CARE; QUALITY; PROMPT;
D O I
10.1111/jcpt.12168
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
What is known and objective: Clinical decision support software (CDSS) has been increasingly implemented to assist improved prescribing practice. Reviews and studies report generally positive results regarding prescribing changes and, to a lesser extent, patient outcomes. Little information is available, however, concerning the use of CDSS in community pharmacy practice. Given the apparent paucity of publications examining this topic, we conducted a review to determine whether CDSS in community pharmacy practice can improve medication use and patient outcomes. Methods: A literature search of articles on CDSS relevant to community pharmacy and published between 1 January 2005 and 21 October 2013 was undertaken. Articles were included if the healthcare setting was community pharmacy and the article indicated that pharmacy use of CDSS was part of the study intervention. Results and discussion: Eight studies were found which assessed counselling, selected drug interactions, inappropriate prescribing and under-prescribing. One study was halted due to insufficient data collection. Six studies showed statistically significant improvements in the measured outcomes: increased patient counselling, 31% reduced frequency of drug-drug interactions (DDIs), reduced frequency of inappropriate medications in the elderly (2.2-1.8% patients) and in pregnant women (5.5-2.9% patients), and increased pharmacists' interventions for under-prescribed low-dose aspirin (1.74 vs. 0.91 per 100 patients with type 2 diabetes) and over-prescribed high-dose proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) (1.67 vs. 0.17 interventions per 100 high-dose PPI prescriptions). What is new and conclusion: Most studies showed improved prescribing practice, via direct communication between pharmacists and doctors or indirectly via patient education. Factors limiting the impact of improved prescribing included alert fatigue and clinical inertia. No study investigated patient outcomes and little investigation had been undertaken on how CDSS could be best implemented. Few studies have been undertaken in community pharmacy practice, and based on the positive findings reported, further research should be directed in this area, including investigation of patient outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:343 / 348
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The role of standardized data and terminological systems in computerized clinical decision support systems: Literature review and survey
    Ahmadian, Leila
    van Engen-Verheul, Mariette
    Bakhshi-Raiez, Ferishta
    Peek, Niels
    Cornet, Ronald
    de Keizer, Nicolette F.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2011, 80 (02) : 81 - 93
  • [42] Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems for the Early Detection of Sepsis Among Adult Inpatients: Scoping Review
    Ackermann, Khalia
    Baker, Jannah
    Green, Malcolm
    Fullick, Mary
    Varinli, Hilal
    Westbrook, Johanna
    Li, Ling
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2022, 24 (02)
  • [43] Changes to supervision in community pharmacy: pharmacist and pharmacy support staff views
    Bradley, Fay
    Schafheutle, Ellen I.
    Willis, Sarah C.
    Noyce, Peter R.
    HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY, 2013, 21 (06) : 644 - 654
  • [44] Cost and economic benefit of clinical decision support systems for cardiovascular disease prevention: a community guide systematic review
    Jacob, Verughese
    Thota, Anilkrishna B.
    Chattopadhyay, Sajal K.
    Njie, Gibril J.
    Proia, Krista K.
    Hopkins, David P.
    Ross, Murray N.
    Pronk, Nicolaas P.
    Clymer, John M.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2017, 24 (03) : 669 - 676
  • [45] Interventions Delivered in the Community Pharmacy to Manage Allergic Rhinitis- A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Jose, Jessica
    Cvetkovski, Biljana
    Kritikos, Vicky
    Tan, Rachel
    Bosnic-Anticevich, Sinthia
    Lourenco, Olga
    PHARMACY, 2020, 8 (02)
  • [46] Clinical decision support system in medical knowledge literature review
    Yang, Junggi
    Kang, Ungu
    Lee, Youngho
    INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & MANAGEMENT, 2016, 17 (01): : 5 - 14
  • [47] A six-year repeated evaluation of computerized clinical decision support system user acceptability
    Grout, Randall W.
    Cheng, Erika R.
    Carroll, Aaron E.
    Bauer, Nerissa S.
    Downs, Stephen M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2018, 112 : 74 - 81
  • [48] Reducing Risk with Clinical Decision Support A Study of Closed Malpractice Claims
    Zuccotti, G.
    Maloney, F. L.
    Feblowitz, J.
    Samal, L.
    Sato, L.
    Wright, A.
    APPLIED CLINICAL INFORMATICS, 2014, 5 (03): : 746 - 756
  • [49] Improving the usability and usefulness of computerized decision support systems for medication review by clinical pharmacists: A convergent, parallel evaluation
    Marcilly, Romaric
    Colliaux, Jeremie
    Robert, Laurine
    Pelayo, Sylvia
    Beuscart, Jean-Baptiste
    Rousseliere, Chloe
    Decaudin, Bertrand
    RESEARCH IN SOCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE PHARMACY, 2023, 19 (01): : 144 - 154
  • [50] Design of an algorithm to support community pharmacy dyspepsia management
    Aradottir, Halldora A. E.
    Kinnear, Moira
    PHARMACY WORLD & SCIENCE, 2008, 30 (05): : 515 - 525