On understanding familiar and less-familiar figurative language

被引:129
作者
Giora, R [1 ]
Fein, O
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Univ, Dept Linguist, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
[2] Princeton Univ, Dept Psychol, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
关键词
salience; familiar; metaphor; idiom; figurative language; literal language;
D O I
10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00006-5
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
Findings of three experiments are consistent with the graded salience hypothesis (Giora, 1997), according to which salient meanings should be processed initially before less salient meanings are activated. A meaning of a word or an expression is considered salient if it can be retrieved directly from the mental lexicon. According to the graded salience hypothesis, processing familiar metaphors (which have at least two salient interpretations - the literal and the metaphoric) should involve activation of both their metaphoric and literal meanings, regardless of the type of context in which they are embedded. Processing less familiar metaphors (which have only one salient meaning - the literal) should activate the literal meaning in both types of contexts; however, in the literally biased context, it should be the only one activated. Processing familiar idioms in a context biased towards the idiomatic meaning should evoke their figurative meaning almost exclusively, because their figurative meaning is much more salient than their literal meaning. However, processing less familiar idioms in an idiomatic context should activate both their literal and idiomatic meanings, because both meanings enjoy similar salience status. In a literally biased context, familiar idioms should evoke their more salient idiomatic meaning to a greater extent than less familiar idioms. A word fragment completion test was used to measure the amount of activation of literal and figurative meanings in both literally and figuratively biased contexts. Subjects were presented with 'target sentences' (metaphors or idioms) at the end of either figuratively or literally biased contexts. They were asked to complete fragmented words (such as t_b_e) with the first word that came to mind. The target words were related to either the figurative or the literal meaning of the target sentence, so that activation of the different meanings could be assessed. Findings reveal that, contrary to current beliefs, metaphor interpretation involves processing the literal meaning. They further reveal that metaphor and literal interpretations do not involve equivalent processes. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1601 / 1618
页数:18
相关论文
共 48 条
[2]   ON THE SPONTANEITY OF TRAIT ATTRIBUTION - CONVERGING EVIDENCE FOR THE ROLE OF COGNITIVE STRATEGY [J].
BASSILI, JN ;
SMITH, MC .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 50 (02) :239-245
[3]   AUDITORY AND VISUAL WORD-STEM COMPLETION - SEPARATING DATA-DRIVEN AND CONCEPTUALLY DRIVEN PROCESSES [J].
BASSILI, JN ;
SMITH, MC ;
MACLEOD, CM .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 41 (03) :439-453
[4]   EFFECTS OF FAMILIARITY AND APTNESS ON METAPHOR PROCESSING [J].
BLASKO, DG ;
CONNINE, CM .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1993, 19 (02) :295-308
[5]   INVESTIGATING DISSOCIATIONS AMONG MEMORY MEASURES - SUPPORT FOR A TRANSFER-APPROPRIATE PROCESSING FRAMEWORK [J].
BLAXTON, TA .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1989, 15 (04) :657-668
[6]   LEVEL OF PROCESSING AFFECTS PRIMING IN WORD FRAGMENT COMPLETION [J].
CHALLIS, BH ;
BRODBECK, DR .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1992, 18 (03) :595-607
[7]  
Dan Sperbery Deirdre Wilson., 1995, RELEVANCE COMMUNICAT
[8]  
Gernsbacher M., 1990, Language comprehension as structure building, DOI 10.21236/ADA221854
[9]   READING SKILL AND SUPPRESSION REVISITED [J].
GERNSBACHER, MA ;
ROBERTSON, RRW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1995, 6 (03) :165-169
[10]   THE MECHANISM OF SUPPRESSION - A COMPONENT OF GENERAL COMPREHENSION SKILL [J].
GERNSBACHER, MA ;
FAUST, ME .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1991, 17 (02) :245-262