Electrofishing, Snorkel Spearing, and Piscicide Eradicate Brook Trout From a Small, Isolated Bull Trout Population

被引:4
作者
Banish, Nolan P. [1 ]
Tinniswood, William R. [2 ]
Smith, Terry A. [3 ]
机构
[1] US Fish & Wildlife Serv, Klamath Falls Fish & Wildlife Off, 1936 Calif Ave, Klamath Falls, OR 97601 USA
[2] Oregon Dept Fish & Wildlife, Klamath Watershed Dist Off, 1850 Miller Isl Rd West, Klamath Falls, OR 97603 USA
[3] US Forest Serv, Fremont Winema Natl Forest, 2819 Dahlia St, Klamath Falls, OR 97601 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF FISH AND WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT | 2019年 / 10卷 / 01期
关键词
Bull Trout; Brook Trout; removal techniques; Klamath; FRESH-WATER BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION; INTRODUCTIONS; INVASION; REMOVAL; RAINBOW; ECOLOGY;
D O I
10.3996/092018-JFWM-088
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
In 1992, a sampling crew from a multiagency group discovered a population of Bull Trout Salvelinus confluentus estimated at approximately 50 individuals in Threemile Creek, Oregon threatened with competition and hybridization with nonnative Brook Trout Salvelinus fontinalis. The group implemented Brook Trout and Bull Trout X Brook Trout hybrid removal using multiple techniques to conserve this population of Bull Trout in the Klamath River basin. From 1996 to 2000, backpack electrofishing and night snorkel spearing were used upstream of a culvert barrier to eradicate Brook Trout and hybrid trout from a 3.59-km section of Threemile Creek over 101 total days of effort (274 person-days of effort). Night snorkel spearing removed a lower percentage (7%) of target fish relative to electrofishing (93%), although this technique eliminated the risk of electrofishing injury to Bull Trout. Concurrent with the reduction and subsequent removal of Brook Trout, Bull Trout observations increased over 15-fold from 19 in 1996 to 299 in 2012 and Bull Trout distribution more than doubled, from 1.48 to 3.43 km during that same time. Immediately downstream in a separate 2.3-km section, the group eradicated Brook Trout using backpack electrofishing and rotenone application upstream of two man-made barriers from 2004 to 2010 over 43 total days of effort (150 person-days of effort). By 2016, Bull Trout had expanded their distribution throughout the upper 3.59-km section of Threemile Creek. Effort expended to eradicate Brook Trout was similar to successful eradication in other streams with comparable habitat characteristics and similar treatment length (< 3.0 km). However, similar removal attempts have not been successful in streams with comparable habitat characteristics that had longer treatment length (> 7.0 km). Application of piscicide may be more cost effective than manual techniques to remove Brook Trout when there is no risk to native fish of conservation concern, where target species are allopatric, and when piscicide use is publicly accepted. Brook Trout eradication proved valuable in providing Bull Trout the opportunity for range expansion and increased abundance necessary for recovery in the Klamath River basin.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 227
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
[21]   Evaluation of an unsuccessful brook trout electrofishing removal project in a small rocky mountain stream [J].
Meyer, Kevin A. ;
Lamansky, James A., Jr. ;
Schill, Daniel J. .
NORTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES MANAGEMENT, 2006, 26 (04) :849-860
[22]   Population ecology of an invasion: Effects of brook trout on native cutthroat trout [J].
Peterson, DP ;
Fausch, KD ;
White, GC .
ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2004, 14 (03) :754-772
[23]   An evaluation of multipass electrofishing for estimating the abundance of stream-dwelling salmonids [J].
Peterson, JT ;
Thurow, RF ;
Guzevich, JW .
TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN FISHERIES SOCIETY, 2004, 133 (02) :462-475
[24]  
Reynolds JB, 2012, FISHERIES TECHNIQUES, THIRD EDITION, P305
[25]  
Ricciardi A, 2011, FIFTY YEARS OF INVASION ECOLOGY: THE LEGACY OF CHARLES ELTON, P211
[26]   Have brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) displaced bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) along longitudinal gradients in central Idaho streams? [J].
Rieman, BE ;
Peterson, JT ;
Myers, DL .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES AND AQUATIC SCIENCES, 2006, 63 (01) :63-78
[27]  
Rieman BE, 2001, N AM J FISH MANAGE, V21, P756, DOI 10.1577/1548-8675(2001)021<0756:EPSAGC>2.0.CO
[28]  
2
[29]  
Rieman Bruce E., 1997, North American Journal of Fisheries Management, V17, P1111, DOI 10.1577/1548-8675(1997)017<1111:DSALFT>2.3.CO
[30]  
2