Modeling approaches to estimate effective leaf area index from aerial discrete-return LIDAR

被引:216
作者
Richardson, Jeffrey J. [1 ]
Moskal, L. Monika [1 ]
Kim, Soo-Hyung [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, UW Bot Gardens, Coll Forest Resources, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
Leaf area index; LIDAR; Hemispherical photographs; Urban forest; Modeling; Vegetation; NET PRIMARY PRODUCTION; LASER-SCANNING DATA; HEMISPHERICAL PHOTOGRAPHY; BIOPHYSICAL PROPERTIES; ANGLE DISTRIBUTION; CANOPY STRUCTURE; BOREAL FORESTS; LAI; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; INSTRUMENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.02.007
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Leaf area index (LAI) has traditionally been difficult to estimate accurately at the landscape scale, especially in heterogeneous vegetation with a range in LAI, but remains an important parameter for many ecological models. Several different methods have recently been proposed to estimate LAI using aerial light detection and ranging (LIDAR), but few systematic approaches have been attempted to assess the performance of these methods using a large, independent dataset with a wide range of LAI in a heterogeneous, mixed forest. In this study, four modeling approaches to estimate LAI using aerial discrete-return LIDAR have been compared to 98 separate hemispherical photograph LAI estimates from a heterogeneous mixed forest with a wide range of LAI. Among the four approaches tested, the model based on the Beer-Lambert law with a single parameter (k: extinction coefficient) exhibited highest accuracy (r(2) = 0.665) compared with the other models based on allometric relationships. It is shown that the theoretical k value (=0.5) assuming a spherical leaf angle distribution and the zenith angle of vertical beams (=0 degrees) may be adequate to estimate effective LAI of vegetation using LIDAR data. This model was then applied to six 30 m x 30 m plots at differing spatial extents to investigate the relationship between plot size and model accuracy, observing that model accuracy increased with increasing spatial extent, with a maximum r(2) of 0.78 at an area of 900 m(2). Findings of the present study can provide useful information for selection and application of LIDAR derived LAI models at landscape or other spatial scales of ecological importance. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1152 / 1160
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Andersen H., 2005, Forest measurement and monitoring using high-resolution airborne lidar, P109
[2]   Global synthesis of leaf area index observations: implications for ecological and remote sensing studies [J].
Asner, GP ;
Scurlock, JMO ;
Hicke, JA .
GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2003, 12 (03) :191-205
[3]   Ground-based measurements of leaf area index:: a review of methods, instruments and current controversies [J].
Bréda, NJJ .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2003, 54 (392) :2403-2417
[4]   Leaf area index of boreal forests: Theory, techniques, and measurements [J].
Chen, JM ;
Rich, PM ;
Gower, ST ;
Norman, JM ;
Plummer, S .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1997, 102 (D24) :29429-29443
[5]   QUANTIFYING THE EFFECT OF CANOPY ARCHITECTURE ON OPTICAL MEASUREMENTS OF LEAF-AREA INDEX USING 2 GAP SIZE ANALYSIS-METHODS [J].
CHEN, JM ;
CIHLAR, J .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 1995, 33 (03) :777-787
[6]   Simple scaling of photosynthesis from leaves to canopies without the errors of big-leaf models [J].
dePury, DGG ;
Farquhar, GD .
PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT, 1997, 20 (05) :537-557
[7]   Development of a simulation model to predict LiDAR interception in forested environments [J].
Goodwin, N. R. ;
Coops, N. C. ;
Culvenor, D. S. .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 111 (04) :481-492
[9]   Direct and indirect estimation of leaf area index, fAPAR, and net primary production of terrestrial ecosystems [J].
Gower, ST ;
Kucharik, CJ ;
Norman, JM .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 1999, 70 (01) :29-51
[10]   Assessment of defoliation during a pine sawfly outbreak: Calibration of airborne laser scanning data with hemispherical photography [J].
Hanssen, Kjersti Holt ;
Solberg, Svein .
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2007, 250 (1-2) :9-16