Resin adhesion to caries-affected dentine after different removal methods

被引:28
|
作者
Sattabanasuk, V.
Burrow, M. F.
Shimada, Y.
Tagami, J.
机构
[1] Srinakharinwirot Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Conservat Dent & Prosthodont, Bangkok, Thailand
[2] Univ Melbourne, Sch Dent Sci, Parkville, Vic 3052, Australia
[3] Tokyo Med & Dent Univ, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
bond strength; caries-affected dentine; smear layer;
D O I
10.1111/j.1834-7819.2006.tb00421.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background Caries-affected dentine is the common bonding substrate when treating a patient. At present, there are many methods used for caries removal. The aim of this study was to evaluate the microtensile bond strength of two adhesives (Clearfil Protect Bond and OptiBond Solo Plus Total-Etch) to caries-affected dentine after three different caries removal methods. Methods: Extracted carious human third molars were used and caries-affected dentine surfaces were obtained from one of the three removal methods: (i) round steel bur in a slow-speed handpiece; (ii) Er:YAG laser; or (iii) 600-grit silicon carbide abrasive paper. Each of the adhesives was used to bond resin composite to the caries-affected dentine according to the manufacturers' instructions. Hourglass-shaped specimens were prepared and stressed in tension at 1 mm/min. Data were analysed using two-way analysis of variance and least significant difference test. Results: Clearfil Protect Bond showed significantly lower bond strength than OptiBond Solo Plus Total-Etch after caries removal with round steel bur, but the opposite was found for specimens treated with silicon carbide abrasive paper. For laser-treated dentine, no significant differences between the adhesives were revealed. Conclusions: Besides the differences in adhesives, different caries removal methods seem to influence resin adhesion to caries-affected dentine.
引用
收藏
页码:162 / 169
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [21] Microhardness and Ca:P ratio of carious and Carisolv™ treated caries-affected dentine using an ultra-micro-indentation system and energy dispersive analysis of x-rays -: A pilot study
    Sakoolnamarka, R
    Burrow, MF
    Swain, M
    Tyas, MJ
    AUSTRALIAN DENTAL JOURNAL, 2005, 50 (04) : 246 - 250
  • [22] Effect of different cleaning methods after surface treatment of dental ceramics on the surface characteristics and adhesion to resin-based luting agents
    Orso, Eloise Ane
    Varella de Carvalho, Rodrigo
    Maroli, Angelica
    Cadore-Rodrigues, Ana Carolina
    Morisso, Fernando Dal Pont
    Pereira, Gabriel Kalil Rocha
    Bacchi, Atais
    JOURNAL OF ADHESION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 36 (21) : 2368 - 2379
  • [23] Effect of different repair methods on the bond strength of resin composite to CAD/CAM materials and microorganisms adhesion: An in situ study
    Verissimo, Aretha Heitor
    Duarte Moura, Dayanne Monielle
    de Oliveira Dal Piva, Amanda Maria
    Bottino, Marco Antonio
    Dantas de Almeida, Leopoldina de Fatima
    Porto Carreiro, Adriana da Fonte
    de Assuncao e Souza, Rodrigo Othavio
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2020, 93
  • [24] Four-year clinical prospective follow-up of resin composite restoration after selective caries removal using Er:YAG laser
    Valerio, Rodrigo Alexandre
    Galo, Rodrigo
    Galafassi, Daniel
    Milori Corona, Silmara Aparecida
    Borsatto, Maria Cristina
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2020, 24 (07) : 2271 - 2283
  • [25] Effects Of Chemical And Physico-Chemical Surface Conditioning Methods On The Adhesion Of Resin Composite To Different Mineral Trioxide Aggregate Based Cements
    Eyuboglu, Tan Firat
    Olcay, Keziban
    Ozcan, Mutlu
    JOURNAL OF ADHESION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 33 (16) : 1836 - 1845