A comparison of different intensity modulation treatment techniques for tangential breast irradiation

被引:84
作者
Chang, SX [1 ]
Deschesne, KM [1 ]
Cullip, TJ [1 ]
Parker, SA [1 ]
Earnhart, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Sch Med, N Carolina Clin Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 1999年 / 45卷 / 05期
关键词
contralateral breast dose; intensity modulation; multileaf collimator; compensator; virtual wedge; tangential breast irradiation; dose optimization;
D O I
10.1016/S0360-3016(99)00344-2
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Several intensity modulation (IM) treatment techniques for tangential breast irradiation were evaluated in terms of dose uniformity in the treated breast volume, contralateral breast dose, and treatment irradiation time. Methods and Materials: Contralateral breast dose was measured via TLD chips, and the dose uniformity was calculated on two anthropomorphic phantoms. IM was applied to all beams or to the lateral-medial (LM) beam only. The techniques evaluated include (a) IM via "step & shoot" multileaf collimator (MLC), (b) IM via intensity modulator (compensator), (c) virtual wedge, and (d) physical wedge. A dose optimization algorithm was used for the first two techniques. Results: Collimator-generated IM techniques (MLC-IM and the virtual wedge) produced 50% (average) less contralateral breast dose than the conventional two-wedge technique. When the compensator or the physical wedge was used, contralateral breast dose was reduced 30% (average) by leaving the ML beam open. Conclusion: The treatments generated by dose optimization algorithm;ind delivered via the compensator and MLC techniques offered superior dose uniformity. Single-beam IM techniques in general use less irradiation time without significant degradation of dose uniformity. The MLC-IM technique in this study required the longest treatment irradiation time, while the virtual wedge and compensator IM techniques required the least. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1305 / 1314
页数:10
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Evaluation of optimized compensators on a 3D planning system [J].
Basran, PS ;
Ansbacher, W ;
Field, GC ;
Murray, BR .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1998, 25 (10) :1837-1844
[2]  
BATHO H F, 1964, J Can Assoc Radiol, V15, P79
[3]   CANCER IN THE CONTRALATERAL BREAST AFTER RADIOTHERAPY FOR BREAST-CANCER [J].
BOICE, JD ;
HARVEY, EB ;
BLETTNER, M ;
STOVALL, M ;
FLANNERY, JT .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1992, 326 (12) :781-785
[4]   Modulated beam conformal therapy for head and neck tumors [J].
Boyer, AL ;
Geis, P ;
Grant, W ;
Carol, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 39 (01) :227-236
[5]   OPTIMIZATION OF STATIONARY AND MOVING BEAM RADIATION-THERAPY TECHNIQUES [J].
BRAHME, A .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1988, 12 (02) :129-140
[6]  
BROWN L, 1997, P 12 INT C COMP RAD
[7]   Planning, delivery, and quality assurance of intensity-modulated radiotherapy using dynamic multileaf collimator: A strategy for large-scale implementation for the treatment of carcinoma of the prostate [J].
Burman, C ;
Chui, CS ;
Kutcher, G ;
Leibel, S ;
Zelefsky, M ;
LoSasso, T ;
Spirou, S ;
Wu, QW ;
Yang, J ;
Stein, J ;
Mohan, R ;
Fuks, Z ;
Ling, CC .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 39 (04) :863-873
[8]  
CHANG SX, 1996, MED PHYS, V23, P1072
[9]   Validation of a new virtual wedge model [J].
Desobry, GE ;
Waldron, TJ ;
Das, IJ .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1998, 25 (01) :71-72
[10]  
DUBAL NV, 1998, P 40 ANN ASTRO M