Bayesian dose-finding in phase I/II clinical trials using toxicity and efficacy odds ratios

被引:120
作者
Yin, Guosheng [1 ]
Li, Yisheng [1 ]
Ji, Yuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat & Appl Math, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
Bayesian adaptive design; bivariate binary model; equivalence contour; Gibbs sampling; trade-offs;
D O I
10.1111/j.1541-0420.2006.00534.x
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
A Bayesian adaptive design is proposed for dose-finding in phase I/II clinical trials to incorporate the bivariate outcomes, toxicity and efficacy, of a new treatment. Without specifying any parametric functional form for the drug dose-response curve, we jointly model the bivariate binary data to account for the correlation between toxicity and efficacy. After observing all the responses of each cohort of patients, the dosage for the next cohort is escalated, deescalated, or unchanged according to the proposed odds ratio criteria constructed from the posterior toxicity and efficacy probabilities. A novel class of prior distributions is proposed through logit transformations which implicitly imposes a monotonic constraint on dose toxicity probabilities and correlates the probabilities of the bivariate outcomes. We conduct simulation studies to evaluate the operating characteristics of the proposed method. Under various scenarios, the new Bayesian design based on the toxicity-efficacy odds ratio trade-offs exhibits good properties and treats most patients at the desirable dose levels. The method is illustrated with a real trial design for a breast medical oncology study.
引用
收藏
页码:777 / 784
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   A Bayesian approach to jointly modeling toxicity and biomarker expression in a phase I/II dose-finding trial [J].
Bekele, BN ;
Shen, Y .
BIOMETRICS, 2005, 61 (02) :344-354
[2]   The bivariate continual reassessment method: extending the CRM to phase I trials of two competing outcomes [J].
Braun, TA .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 2002, 23 (03) :240-256
[3]   On the use of nonparametric curves in phase I trials with low toxicity tolerance [J].
Cheung, YK .
BIOMETRICS, 2002, 58 (01) :237-240
[4]   GLOBAL CROSS-RATIO MODELS FOR BIVARIATE, DISCRETE, ORDERED RESPONSES [J].
DALE, JR .
BIOMETRICS, 1986, 42 (04) :909-917
[5]   A curve-free method for Phase I clinical trials [J].
Gasparini, M ;
Eisele, J .
BIOMETRICS, 2000, 56 (02) :609-615
[6]   ADAPTIVE REJECTION METROPOLIS SAMPLING WITHIN GIBBS SAMPLING [J].
GILKS, WR ;
BEST, NG ;
TAN, KKC .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES C-APPLIED STATISTICS, 1995, 44 (04) :455-472
[7]   SOME PRACTICAL IMPROVEMENTS IN THE CONTINUAL REASSESSMENT METHOD FOR PHASE-I STUDIES [J].
GOODMAN, SN ;
ZAHURAK, ML ;
PIANTADOSI, S .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1995, 14 (11) :1149-1161
[8]   SIMULATION AS A DESIGN TOOL FOR PHASE I/II CLINICAL-TRIALS - AN EXAMPLE FROM BONE-MARROW TRANSPLANTATION [J].
GOOLEY, TA ;
MARTIN, PJ ;
FISHER, LD ;
PETTINGER, M .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1994, 15 (06) :450-462
[9]   A new dose-finding design for bivariate outcomes [J].
Ivanova, A .
BIOMETRICS, 2003, 59 (04) :1001-1007
[10]   A COMPARISON OF 2 PHASE-I TRIAL DESIGNS [J].
KORN, EL ;
MIDTHUNE, D ;
CHEN, TT ;
RUBINSTEIN, LV ;
CHRISTIAN, MC ;
SIMON, RM .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1994, 13 (18) :1799-1806