Consumer impact of an interactive decision aid for rectal cancer patients offered adjuvant therapy

被引:14
作者
Butow, P. N.
Solomon, M.
Young, J. M.
Whelan, T.
Salkeld, G.
Wilson, K.
Harrison, J. D.
Hruby, G.
Mansour, O.
Kennedy, N.
Tattersall, M. H. N.
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sch Psychol, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, SOuRCe, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Sch Publ Hlth, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[4] Univ Sydney, Dept Canc Med, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[5] Royal Prince Alfred Hosp, Dept Colorectal Surg, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia
[6] Royal Prince Alfred Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia
[7] Hamilton Reg Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Hamilton, ON L8V 1C3, Canada
关键词
decision making; patient involvement; decision aids; risk communication; colorectal cancer;
D O I
10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.00975.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective There is increasing interest in the use of decision aids (DAs) to facilitate patient involvement in clinical decisions. This study explored the views of patients with colorectal cancer and participants in a community bowel screening service regarding an interactive DA concerning adjuvant treatment for rectal cancer, and the impact of the aid on knowledge, anxiety, attitudes and preferences for treatment options. Method Fourteen patients with colorectal cancer participated in four focus groups. Eighty-nine participants in a community bowel screening service completed a questionnaire before and 1 week after viewing the DA. Thirty were randomly selected to participate in a telephone interview to obtain qualitative feedback about the DA. Results Focus group participants reported using information to evaluate their doctor's care and expertise, or to prepare themselves for future symptoms and side-effects. Most supported the use of a DA and preferred pie charts to convey risk information. Within the community sample, anxiety remained stable and knowledge increased after exposure to the DA. Almost all participants found the DA useful and easy to understand, and felt it would make the process of decision making easier. Conclusion A DA regarding adjuvant therapy for rectal cancer appears to be valued and to produce positive outcomes. A randomized controlled trial of this intervention is now required.
引用
收藏
页码:676 / 682
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   INFORMATION AND PARTICIPATION PREFERENCES AMONG CANCER-PATIENTS [J].
CASSILETH, BR ;
ZUPKIS, RV ;
SUTTONSMITH, K ;
MARCH, V .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1980, 92 (06) :832-836
[2]  
DAVEY HM, 2003, HLTH EXPECTATIONS, V5, P330
[3]  
DEBER RB, 1994, CAN MED ASSOC J, V151, P171
[4]   DECISION-MAKING DURING SERIOUS ILLNESS - WHAT ROLE DO PATIENTS REALLY WANT TO PLAY [J].
DEGNER, LF ;
SLOAN, JA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1992, 45 (09) :941-950
[5]   Swedish rectal cancer trial: Long lasting benefits from radiotherapy on survival and local recurrence rate [J].
Folkesson, J ;
Birgisson, H ;
Pahlman, L ;
Cedermark, B ;
Glimelius, B ;
Gunnarsson, U .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (24) :5644-5650
[6]   Sharing decisions in cancer care [J].
Gattellari, M ;
Butow, PN ;
Tattersall, MHN .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2001, 52 (12) :1865-1878
[7]  
Gray R, 2001, LANCET, V358, P1291
[8]   LOCAL RECURRENCE OF RECTAL ADENOCARCINOMA AFTER CURATIVE SURGERY WITH AND WITHOUT PREOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY [J].
HOLM, T ;
CEDERMARK, B ;
RUTQVIST, LE .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1994, 81 (03) :452-455
[9]  
Marteau T M, 2001, Health Expect, V4, P99, DOI 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2001.00140.x
[10]   The multi-dimensional measure of informed choice: a validation study [J].
Michie, S ;
Dormandy, E ;
Marteau, TA .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2002, 48 (01) :87-91