Energy Performance of the European Union Countries in Terms of Reaching the European Energy Union Objectives

被引:29
作者
Vavrek, Roman [1 ]
Chovancova, Jana [2 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Liberec, Fac Econ, Dept Informat, Liberec 46001 1, Czech Republic
[2] Univ Presov, Dept Environm Management, Fac Management, Presov 08001, Slovakia
关键词
energy union; EU countries; long-term evaluation; TOPSIS technique; coefficient of variance; EU ENERGY; POLICY; GOVERNANCE; TOPSIS;
D O I
10.3390/en13205317
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
European energy policy, especially the project of the Energy Union, is one of the most rapidly developing areas of the EU, and one through which European institutions are obtaining gradually more extensive power over the performance of the national energy sectors. The paper focuses on an analysis of the energy performance of EU member states (MS) with regard to the priorities of the European Energy Union. For an assessment of the energy performance of EU countries, the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) was chosen, using the Coefficient of Variation method (CV) as an objective method for determining the weights of eight input indicators, including CO2 intensity, electricity and gas price, energy productivity, energy dependence, consumption of renewables and research and development. The analysis for the period from 2008 to 2016 showed significant changes in the input indicators, which directly influenced the results of both methods mentioned above. Long-term differences between the best- and worst-rated countries are seen mainly in CO2 emissions, energy imports and total consumption of renewable energy sources. It is these aspects of comprehensive energy performance and their convergence at the level of EU countries that we believe should be addressed in the near future.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 54 条
[21]   Testing the reliability of deterministic multi-criteria decision-making methods using building performance simulation [J].
Kokaraki, Nikoleta ;
Hopfe, Christina J. ;
Robinson, Elaine ;
Nikolaidou, Elli .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2019, 112 (991-1007) :991-1007
[22]  
Kuzemko C, 2012, INT POLIT ECON SER, P1, DOI 10.1057/9780230370944
[23]   Measuring the security of external energy supply in the European Union [J].
Le Coq, Chloe ;
Paltseva, Elena .
ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (11) :4474-4481
[24]   European Union energy policy integration: A case of European Commission policy entrepreneurship and increasing supranationalism [J].
Maltby, Tomas .
ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 55 :435-444
[25]  
Matlary JanneHaaland., 1997, ENERGY POLICY EUROPE
[26]  
Meeus L., 2005, ELECT J, V18, P25, DOI [10.1016/j.tej.2005.06.008, DOI 10.1016/J.TEJ.2005.06.008]
[28]  
Morata F., 2012, European Energy Policy: An Environmental Approach
[29]   Monitoring the coefficient of variation using a variable sample size EWMA chart [J].
Muhammad, Anis Nabila Binti ;
Yeong, Wai Chung ;
Chong, Zhi Lin ;
Lim, Sok Li ;
Khoo, Michael Boon Chong .
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 126 :378-398
[30]   What to Expect from the 2020 Gas Package [J].
Olczak, Maria ;
Piebalgs, Andris .
POLITICS AND GOVERNANCE, 2019, 7 (01) :165-169