Effect of Distributional Assumption of Random Parameters of Mixed Logit Model on Willingness-to-Pay Values

被引:17
作者
Ghosh, Santanu [1 ]
Maitra, Bhargab [1 ]
Das, Sudhanshu Sekhar [2 ]
机构
[1] IIT Kharagpur, Dept Civil Engn, Kharagpur 721302, W Bengal, India
[2] VSSUT, Dept Civil Engn, Sambalpur 768018, W Bengal, India
来源
2ND CONFERENCE OF TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH GROUP OF INDIA (2ND CTRG) | 2013年 / 104卷
关键词
Mixed Logit; Willingness-To-Pay; Stated Preference; Stated Choice; Akaike; TRAVEL-TIME SAVINGS; SPECIFICATIONS; HETEROGENEITY; ATTRIBUTES; VALUATION; SERVICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.154
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
For rational estimation of users' benefit, it is necessary to understand users' willingness-to-pay (WTP). In several WTP studies, stated preference data have been analyzed using Mixed Logit (ML) model specification. In ML models, it is necessary to make an assumption regarding the distribution of random parameters. Researchers have developed ML models with different distributional assumptions of random parameters. However, the effect of distributional assumptions of random parameters in ML model on goodness-of-fit and WTP values has not been studied adequately. In the present work, an investigation is carried out in this regard taking reference to a case study of feeder service to bus stop in rural India. Various Mixed Logit models were attempted with different distributional assumptions of random parameters such as normal, log normal, triangular, uniform, constrained normal, constrained triangular, constrained uniform, etc. Variation of goodness of fit statistics and WTP values are observed across different ML models. The work indicates the importance of distributional assumption while developing ML model in WTP studies. The work also indicates that it is desirable to develop several ML models with different distributional assumptions and then select the superior one based on goodness of fit statistics. (C) 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:601 / 610
页数:10
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2007, NLOGIT 4 0 REF GUID
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Discrete choice methods with simulation
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Working paper
[4]  
Ben-Akiva M., 1985, Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand
[5]   Accommodating variations in responsiveness to level-of-service measures in travel mode choice modeling [J].
Bhat, CR .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 1998, 32 (07) :495-507
[7]   INVESTIGATING HETEROGENEITY IN BRAND PREFERENCES IN LOGIT-MODELS FOR PANEL DATA [J].
CHINTAGUNTA, PK ;
JAIN, DC ;
VILCASSIM, NJ .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1991, 28 (04) :417-428
[8]  
Das S. S., 2012, INT J TRAFFIC TRANSP, V2, P333
[9]  
Das S. S., 2007, INDIAN HIGHWAYS IRC, V35, P31
[10]   Valuing Travel Attributes of Rural Feeder Service to Bus Stop: Comparison of Different Logit Model Specifications [J].
Das, Sudhanshu Sekhar ;
Maitra, Bhargab ;
Boltze, Manfred .
JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2009, 135 (06) :330-337