Quantifying the ecological success of a community-based wildlife conservation area in Tanzania

被引:26
作者
Lee, Derek E. [1 ]
Bond, Monica L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Wild Nat Inst, 15 North Main St 208, Concord, NH 03302 USA
关键词
before-after-control-impact; community-based natural resource management; environmental assessment; ungulate; wildlife management area; wildlife monitoring; NATURAL-RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; PROTECTED AREAS; LAND-USE; DESIGN; ECOSYSTEM; PRIVATE; AFRICA; STATE; REAL;
D O I
10.1093/jmammal/gyy014
中图分类号
Q95 [动物学];
学科分类号
071002 ;
摘要
In Tanzania, community-based natural resource management of wildlife occurs through the creation of Wildlife Management Areas (WMAs). WMAs consist of multiple villages designating land for wildlife conservation, and sharing a portion of subsequent tourism revenues. Nineteen WMAs are currently operating, encompassing 7% of Tanzania's land area, with 19 more WMAs planned. The ecological success or failure of WMAs for wildlife conservation has yet to be quantified. We defined ecological success in this case as significantly greater densities of wildlife and significantly lower densities of livestock in the WMA relative to the control site, after the WMA was established. We used 4 years of distance sampling surveys conducted 6 times per year for wild and domestic ungulates to quantify wildlife and livestock densities before and after the establishment and implementation of management efforts at Randilen WMA, relative to a control site on adjacent land of similar vegetation and habitat types. We documented similarity between the sites before WMA establishment, when both sites were managed by the same authority. After WMA establishment, we documented significantly higher densities of resident wildlife (giraffes and dik-diks) and lower densities of cattle in the WMA, relative to the control site, indicating short-term ecological success. Continued monitoring is necessary to determine longer-term effects, and to evaluate management decisions.
引用
收藏
页码:459 / 464
页数:6
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], WILDL CONS WILDL MAN
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1979, SAMPLING DESIGN STAT
[3]   Wildlife Management in Tanzania: State Control, Rent Seeking and Community Resistance [J].
Benjaminsen, Tor A. ;
Goldman, Mara J. ;
Minwary, Maya Y. ;
Maganga, Faustin P. .
DEVELOPMENT AND CHANGE, 2013, 44 (05) :1087-1109
[4]   Is small really beautiful? Community-based natural resource management in Malawi and Botswana [J].
Blaikie, Piers .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2006, 34 (11) :1942-1957
[5]  
Borner M., 1985, Oryx, V19, P91
[6]   How national context, project design, and local community characteristics influence success in community-based conservation projects [J].
Brooks, Jeremy S. ;
Waylen, Kerry A. ;
Mulder, Monique Borgerhoff .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2012, 109 (52) :21265-21270
[7]  
Buckland S.T., 2001, pi
[8]  
Buckland ST, 2015, METH STAT ECOL, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-19219-2
[9]   Monitoring matters: examining the potential of locally-based approaches [J].
Danielsen, F ;
Burgess, ND ;
Balmford, A .
BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2005, 14 (11) :2507-2542
[10]   Partitioned nature, privileged knowledge: Community-Based Conservation in Tanzania [J].
Goldman, M .
DEVELOPMENT AND CHANGE, 2003, 34 (05) :833-862