Automatic Compositional Verification of Business Processes

被引:0
作者
Mendoza, Luis E. [1 ]
Capel, Manuel I. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Simon Bolivar, Proc & Syst Dept, POB 89000, Caracas 1080A, Venezuela
[2] Univ Granada, ETSI Informat & Telecommun, Software Engn Dept, Granada, Spain
来源
ENTERPRISE INFORMATION SYSTEMS-BK | 2009年 / 24卷
关键词
Business Process Modelling; Verification; Model-Checking; Task Model; Formal Methods;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Nowadays the Business Process Modelling Notation (BPMN) has become a standard to provide a notation readily understandable by all business process (BP) stakeholders when it conics to carrying out the Business Process Modelling (BPM) activity. In this paper, we present a new Formal Compositional Verification Approach (FCVA), based on the Model-Checking verification technique for software, integrated with a formal software design method called MEDISTAM-RT Both are used to facilitate the development of the Task Model (TM) associated to a BP design. MEDISTAM-RT uses UML-RT as its graphical modelling notation and CSP+T formal specification language for temporal annotations. The application of FCVA is aimed at guaranteeing the correctness of the TM with respect to initial property specification derived from the BP rules. One instance of a BPM enterprise-project related to the Customer Relationship Management (CRM) business is discussed in order to show a practical use of our proposal.
引用
收藏
页码:479 / +
页数:3
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   A methodological approach to the formal specification of real-time systems by transformation of UML-RT design models [J].
Akhlaki, K. Benghazi ;
Tunon, M. I. Capel ;
Terriza, J. A. Holgado ;
Morales, L. E. Mendoza .
SCIENCE OF COMPUTER PROGRAMMING, 2007, 65 (01) :41-56
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Model checking
[3]  
Baier C, 2008, PRINCIPLES OF MODEL CHECKING, P1
[4]  
DUURSMA C, 1994, KADS2M5VUBRR00420
[5]  
Eriksson H.E., 1998, Business Modeling With UML
[6]  
ESHUIS H, 2002, THESIS U TWENTE ENSC
[7]  
Formal Systems (Europe) Ltd, 2005, FAIL DIV REF FDR2 US
[8]  
Kruchten P., 2004, RATIONAL UNIFIED PRO
[9]  
MENDOZA L, 2007, INF SOFTW TECHNOL, V49
[10]  
MENDOZA LE, 2007, P 9 INT C ENT INF SY, V3, P205