Adaptation of non-linear mixed amount with zero amount response surface model for analysis of concentration-dependent synergism and safety with midazolam, alfentanil, and propofol sedation

被引:17
作者
Liou, J. -Y. [1 ,2 ]
Ting, C. -K. [1 ,2 ]
Teng, W. -N. [1 ,2 ]
Mandell, M. S. [3 ]
Tsou, M. -Y. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Univ Colorado Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol, Aurora, CO USA
关键词
Alfentanil; Endoscopy; Midazolam; Opioid; Pharmacodynamic; POPULATION PHARMACOKINETICS; VENTILATORY DEPRESSION; DRUG-INTERACTIONS; BISPECTRAL INDEX; REMIFENTANIL; SEVOFLURANE; COMBINATION; LARYNGOSCOPY; STIMULATION; RESPONSIVENESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.bja.2018.01.041
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: The non-linear mixed amount with zero amounts response surface model can be used to describe drug interactions and predict loss of response to noxious stimuli and respiratory depression. We aimed to determine whether this response surface model could be used to model sedation with the triple drug combination of midazolam, alfentanil and propofol. Methods: Sedation was monitored in 56 patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy (modelling group) using modified alertness/sedation scores. A total of 227 combinations of effect-site concentrations were derived from pharmacokinetic models. Accuracy and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were calculated. Accuracy was defined as an absolute difference <0.5 between the binary patient responses and the predicted probability of loss of responsiveness. Validation was performed with a separate group (validation group) of 47 patients. Results: Effect-site concentration ranged from 0 to 108 ng ml(-1) for midazolam, 0-156 ng ml(-1) for alfentanil, and 0-2.6 mu g ml(-1) for propofol in both groups. Synergy was strongest with midazolam and alfentanil (24.3% decrease in U-50, concentration for half maximal drug effect). Adding propofol, a third drug, offered little additional synergy (25.8% decrease in U-50). Two patients (3%) experienced respiratory depression. Model accuracy was 83% and 76%, area under the curve was 0.87 and 0.80 for the modelling and validation group, respectively. Conclusion: The non-linear mixed amount with zero amounts triple interaction response surface model predicts patient sedation responses during endoscopy with combinations of midazolam, alfentanil, or propofol that fall within clinical use. Our model also suggests a safety margin of alfentanil fraction <0.12 that avoids respiratory depression after loss of responsiveness.
引用
收藏
页码:1209 / 1218
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   A Phase IIa, Randomized, Double-Blind Study of Remimazolam (CNS 7056) Versus Midazolam for Sedation in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy [J].
Borkett, Keith M. ;
Riff, Dennis S. ;
Schwartz, Howard I. ;
Winkle, Peter J. ;
Pambianco, Daniel J. ;
Lees, James P. ;
Wilhelm-Ogunbiyi, Karin .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2015, 120 (04) :771-780
[2]   Pharmacodynamic interaction between propofol and remifentanil regarding hypnosis, tolerance of laryngoscopy, bispectral index, and electroencephalographic approximate entropy [J].
Bouillon, TW ;
Bruhn, J ;
Radulescu, L ;
Andresen, C ;
Shafer, TJ ;
Cohane, C ;
Shafer, SL .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2004, 100 (06) :1353-1372
[3]  
BUHRER M, 1990, CLIN PHARMACOL THER, V48, P555
[4]  
CHERNIK DA, 1990, J CLIN PSYCHOPHARM, V10, P244
[5]  
FLOGEL CM, 1993, ANESTH ANALG, V77, P1207
[6]   Drug-interactions: Volatile anesthetics and opioids [J].
Glass, PSA ;
Gan, TJ ;
Howell, S ;
Ginsberg, B .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 1997, 9 :S18-S22
[7]  
GRECO WR, 1995, PHARMACOL REV, V47, P331
[8]   Explaining the acetaminophen-ibuprofen analgesic interaction using a response surface model [J].
Hannam, Jacqueline ;
Anderson, Brian J. .
PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2011, 21 (12) :1234-1240
[9]   Probability to tolerate laryngoscopy and noxious stimulation response index as general indicators of the anaesthetic potency of sevoflurane, propofol, and remifentanil [J].
Hannivoort, L. N. ;
Vereecke, H. E. M. ;
Proost, J. H. ;
Heyse, B. E. K. ;
Eleveld, D. J. ;
Bouillon, T. W. ;
Struys, M. M. R. F. ;
Luginbuehl, M. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2016, 116 (05) :624-631
[10]   A Response Surface Model Approach for Continuous Measures of Hypnotic and Analgesic Effect during Sevoflurane-Remifentanil Interaction Quantifying the Pharmacodynamic Shift Evoked by Stimulation [J].
Heyse, Bjorn ;
Proost, Johannes H. ;
Hannivoort, Laura N. ;
Eleveld, Douglas J. ;
Luginbuehl, Martin ;
Struys, Michel M. R. F. ;
Vereecke, Hugo E. M. .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2014, 120 (06) :1390-1399