Communities Respond to Predatory Lending

被引:20
作者
Caplan, Mary Ager [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Sch Social Work, Athens, GA 30607 USA
关键词
community development; fringe banking; lending circles; predatory lending; unbanked; FINANCIAL SERVICES; CREDIT;
D O I
10.1093/sw/swu008
中图分类号
C916 [社会工作、社会管理、社会规划];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Low-income communities in the United States have faced a history of financial marginalization and exploitation, most evident today in the proliferation of predatory financial services, such as payday lending and check-cashing services. Ameliorating the negative effects of predatory lending has become increasingly important on the agenda of community development efforts and the field of social work. Through the use of case studies, this article describes three specific strategies that communities use to increase financial inclusion and buffer against the deleterious effects of predatory lending: inclusion, community-based alternatives, and community advocacy.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 156
页数:8
相关论文
共 46 条
[31]  
Kretzmann J., 1993, BUILDING COMMUNITIES
[32]  
Logan A., 2009, Who Borrows From Payday Lenders? An Analysis of Newly Available Data
[33]  
Martin Douglas, 2001, NY TIMES
[34]  
Midgley J., 1998, Community economic development and social work, P29, DOI DOI 10.1300/J125V05N01_03
[35]  
Mission Asset Fund, LEND CIRCL
[36]  
Rivlin G., 2010, Broke, USA: From pawnshops to poverty
[37]  
Smith StephenC., 2007, ENDING GLOBAL POVERT
[38]  
Smock Kristina., 2004, DEMOCRACY ACTION COM
[39]  
Squires G.D., 2003, Organizing Access to Capital: Advocacy and the Democratization of Financial Institutions
[40]   Payday lending [J].
Stegman, Michael A. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2007, 21 (01) :169-190