Communities Respond to Predatory Lending

被引:20
作者
Caplan, Mary Ager [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Sch Social Work, Athens, GA 30607 USA
关键词
community development; fringe banking; lending circles; predatory lending; unbanked; FINANCIAL SERVICES; CREDIT;
D O I
10.1093/sw/swu008
中图分类号
C916 [社会工作、社会管理、社会规划];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Low-income communities in the United States have faced a history of financial marginalization and exploitation, most evident today in the proliferation of predatory financial services, such as payday lending and check-cashing services. Ameliorating the negative effects of predatory lending has become increasingly important on the agenda of community development efforts and the field of social work. Through the use of case studies, this article describes three specific strategies that communities use to increase financial inclusion and buffer against the deleterious effects of predatory lending: inclusion, community-based alternatives, and community advocacy.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 156
页数:8
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
Alinsky S. D., 1971, RULES FADICALS PRACT
[2]  
Apgar William., 2003, Economic Policy Review, V9, P169
[3]  
Apgar WilliamC., 2006, Subprime Lending and Alternative Financial Service Providers: A Literature Review and Empirical Analysis
[4]  
Applied Research & Consulting, 2009, FIN CAP US IN REP RE
[5]  
Atlas John., 2010, Seeds of Change: The Story of ACORN, America's Most Controversial Antipoverty Community Organizing Group
[6]  
BARRINGER P, 1993, EC DEV COMMENTARY, V17, P4
[7]  
Barron K., 2001, FORBES
[8]   Introduction to focus issue: Use of financial services by low-income households [J].
Bates, T ;
Dunham, CR .
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT QUARTERLY, 2003, 17 (01) :3-7
[9]   Community development financial institutions: Current issues and future prospects [J].
Benjamin, L ;
Rubin, JS ;
Zielenbach, S .
JOURNAL OF URBAN AFFAIRS, 2004, 26 (02) :177-195
[10]  
Bhatt N, 1999, HARVARD BUS REV, V77, P26