Validation of a multipoint near-infrared spectroscopy method for in-line moisture content analysis during freeze-drying

被引:27
作者
Kauppinen, An [1 ]
Toiviainen, Maunu [2 ,3 ]
Lehtonen, Marko [1 ]
Jarvinen, Kristiina [1 ]
Paaso, Janne
Juuti, Mikko [2 ,3 ]
Ketolainen, Jarkko [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Eastern Finland, Fac Hlth Sci, Promis Ctr, Sch Pharm, FI-70211 Kuopio, Finland
[2] VTT Tech Res Ctr Finland, Opt Measurement Technol, FI-70211 Kuopio, Finland
[3] VTT Tech Res Ctr Finland, Opt Measurement Technol, FI-90571 Oulu, Finland
关键词
Freeze-drying; Moisture; Multipoint near-infrared spectroscopy; Validation; Accuracy profile; QUANTITATIVE ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES; SFSTP PROPOSAL; HARMONIZATION; STRATEGIES; STABILITY; RAMAN;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpba.2014.03.008
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
This study assessed the validity of a multipoint near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy method for in-line moisture content analysis during a freeze-drying process. It is known that the moisture content affects the stability of a freeze-dried product and hence it is a major critical quality attribute. Therefore assessment of the validity of an analytical method for moisture content determination is vital to ensure the quality of the final product. An aqueous sucrose solution was used as the model formulation of the study. The NIR spectra were calibrated to the moisture content using partial least squares (PLS) regression with coulometric Karl Fischer (KF) titration as the reference method. Different spectral preprocessing methods were compared for the PLS models. A calibration model transfer protocol was established to enable the use of the method in the multipoint mode. The accuracy profile was used as a decision tool to determine the validity of the method. The final PLS model, in which NIR spectra were preprocessed with standard normal variate transformation (SNV), resulted in low root mean square error of prediction value of 0.04%-m/v, i.e. evidence of sufficient overall accuracy of the model. The validation results revealed that the accuracy of the model was acceptable within the moisture content range 0.16-0.70%-m/v that is specific for the latter stages of the freeze-drying process. In addition, the results demonstrated the method's reliable in-process performance and robustness. Thus, the multipoint NIR spectroscopy method was proved capable of providing in-line evaluation of moisture content and it is readily available for use in laboratory scale freeze-drying research and development. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:229 / 237
页数:9
相关论文
共 52 条
[41]  
Pikal MJ., 2002, ENCY PHARM TECHNOLOG, P1299
[42]   Improvement of the decision efficiency of the accuracy profile by means of a desirability function for analytical methods validation -: Application to a diacetyl-monoxime colorimetric assay used for the determination of urea in transdermal iontophoretic extracts [J].
Rozet, E. ;
Wascotte, V. ;
Lecouturier, N. ;
Preat, V. ;
Dewe, W. ;
Boulanger, B. ;
Hubert, Ph. .
ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2007, 591 (02) :239-247
[43]   Using tolerance intervals in pre-study validation of analytical methods to predict in-study results -: The fit-for-future-purpose concept [J].
Rozet, Eric ;
Hubert, Cedric ;
Ceccato, Attilio ;
Dewe, Walthere ;
Ziemons, Eric ;
Moonen, Francois ;
Michail, Karim ;
Wintersteiger, Reinhold ;
Streel, Bruno ;
Boulanger, Bruno ;
Hubert, Philippe .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2007, 1158 (1-2) :126-137
[44]   Analysis of recent pharmaceutical regulatory documents on analytical method validation [J].
Rozet, Eric ;
Ceccato, Attilio ;
Hubert, Cedric ;
Ziemons, Eric ;
Oprean, Radu ;
Rudaz, Serge ;
Boulanger, Bruno ;
Hubert, Philippe .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2007, 1158 (1-2) :111-125
[45]   Bioanalytical Method Validation—A Revisit with a Decade of Progress [J].
Vinod P. Shah ;
Kamal K. Midha ;
John W. A. Findlay ;
Howard M. Hill ;
James D. Hulse ;
Iain J. McGilveray ;
Gordon McKay ;
Krys J. Miller ;
Rabindra N. Patnaik ;
Mark L. Powell ;
Alfred Tonelli ;
C. T. Viswanathan ;
Avraham Yacobi .
Pharmaceutical Research, 2000, 17 (12) :1551-1557
[46]  
Sheehan P, 1998, BIOTECHNOL BIOENG, V60, P712, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19981220)60:6<712::AID-BIT8>3.0.CO
[47]  
2-4
[48]  
The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), 2014, NAT DRUG COD DIR
[49]  
The United States Pharmacopeial Convention (USP), 2008, 36 1058 AN INSTR QUA
[50]  
U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2011, GUID IND PROC VAL GE