Retrospective Evaluation of the Influence of Pupil Size on Visual Acuity After KAMRA Inlay Implantation

被引:10
作者
Tomita, Minoru [1 ,3 ]
Kanamori, Tomomi [1 ]
Waring, George O. [2 ]
Huseynova, Tukezban [1 ]
机构
[1] Shinagawa LASIK Ctr, Tokyo 1000006, Japan
[2] Med Univ S Carolina, Storm Eye Inst, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[3] Wenzhou Med Coll, Dept Ophthalmol, Wenzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
PHOTOREFRACTIVE KERATECTOMY; SURGICAL-CORRECTION; INTRACORNEAL INLAY; RADIAL KERATOTOMY; PRESBYOPIA; DIAMETER; EYE;
D O I
10.3928/1081597X-20140530-03
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To investigate the influence of pupil size on visual acuity after KAMRA inlay (AcuFocus, Inc., Irvine, CA) implantation. METHODS: Five hundred eighty-four presbyopic eyes of 584 patients who underwent LASIK were evaluated. Uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA), uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and corrected near visual acuity (CNVA) were measured. Two groups were classified: small pupil (pupil diameter < 6 mm) and large pupil (pupil diameter >= 6 mm) for both mesopic (pupil diameter < 4 mm) and photopic (pupil diameter >= 4 mm) pupil size parameters. The follow-up period was 6 months. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in UNVA (P = .98) and CNVA (P = .16) between the mesopic pupil size groups; however, there were significant differences in UDVA (P = .023) and CDVA (P = .039). There was a weak correlation between pupil size and UDVA of the large mesopic pupil size group (r(s) = 0.129, P = .04). There were no significant differences in UNVA (P = .78), CNVA (P = .92), UDVA (P = .19), and CDVA (P = .60) for the photopic pupil size groups. CONCLUSIONS: Pupil size does not have an influence on the resultant visual acuity after KAMRA inlay implantation. No correlation was found between preoperative and postoperative pupil size and visual acuity for the mesopic pupil groups.
引用
收藏
页码:448 / U20
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Abdul N, 2009, S AFR OPTOM, V68, P38
[2]  
Applegate R A, 1990, Refract Corneal Surg, V6, P47
[3]   Subjective depth-of-focus of the eye [J].
Atchison, DA ;
Charman, WN ;
Woods, RL .
OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 1997, 74 (07) :511-520
[4]   Day to day variability of the dark-adapted pupil diameter [J].
Brown, SA ;
Khanani, AM ;
Xu, KT .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2004, 30 (03) :639-644
[5]   PUPIL DIAMETER AND DEPTH-OF-FIELD OF HUMAN EYE AS MEASURED BY LASER SPECKLE [J].
CHARMAN, WN ;
WHITEFOOT, H .
OPTICA ACTA, 1977, 24 (12) :1211-1216
[6]  
Durrie Daniel S, 2006, Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc, V104, P366
[7]   Effect of larger ablation zone and transition zone on corneal optical aberrations after photorefractive keratectomy [J].
Endl, MJ ;
Martinez, CE ;
Klyce, SD ;
McDonald, MB ;
Coorpender, SJ ;
Applegate, RA ;
Howland, HC .
ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2001, 119 (08) :1159-1164
[8]   Optics of refractive surgery [J].
Eshbaugh, CG ;
Polchak, JR ;
Krueger, RR .
INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY CLINICS, 2000, 40 (03) :1-10
[9]   THE RELATIONSHIP OF VISUAL-ACUITY, REFRACTIVE ERROR, AND PUPIL SIZE AFTER RADIAL KERATOTOMY [J].
HOLLADAY, JT ;
LYNN, MJ ;
WARING, GO ;
GEMMILL, M ;
KEEHN, GC ;
FIELDING, B .
ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1991, 109 (01) :70-76
[10]   Age related changes in the characteristics of the near pupil response [J].
Kasthurirangan, S ;
Glasser, A .
VISION RESEARCH, 2006, 46 (8-9) :1393-1403