Sources, sinks and transformations of organic carbon in Australian floodplain rivers

被引:181
作者
Robertson, AI
Bunn, SE
Boon, PI
Walker, KF
机构
[1] Charles Sturt Univ, Sch Sci & Technol, Johnstone Ctr, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2678, Australia
[2] Griffith Univ, Fac Environm Sci, Nathan, Qld 4111, Australia
[3] Victoria Univ Technol, Dept Environm Management, Melbourne, Vic 3000, Australia
[4] Univ Adelaide, Dept Zool, Cooperat Res Ctr Freshwater Ecol, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1071/MF99112
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
This paper reviews research on fluxes of carbon in Australian floodplain rivers. Except where cover is absent, and in-stream gross primary production is >1 gC m(-2) day(-1) and ratios of production to respiration are >1, riparian sources dominate carbon pools in catchment streams. On floodplains, primary production by river red gum (Eucalyptus camaldulensis) forests is similar to 600 gC m(-2) year(-1). Total primary production by aquatic macrophytes and biofilms in floodplain wetlands is >2500 gC m(-2) year(-1) and >620 gC m(-2) year(-1), respectively. Large pools of particulate organic carbon (POC) exist on floodplains as litter (>500 gC m(-2)) and coarse woody debris (similar to 6 kgC m(-2)). Floods may release 50 gDOC m(-2) from leaf litter. Export of this DOC (dissolved organic carbon) may be substantial relative to autochthonous production in river channels. Sediments deposited on floodplains during large floods represent a substantial sink of riverine POC (up to 280 gC m(-2)). Bacteria are responsible for rapid decomposition of DOC and POC in floodplain wetlands (sediment respiration and methanogenesis, both similar to 1 gC m(-2) day(-1)). Flow and its interaction with geomorphology control carbon fluxes in rivers. Decreased inputs of floodplain carbon, following river regulation and physical disturbances to catchments and floodplains, may have resulted in many Australian rivers being dominated by algal production.
引用
收藏
页码:813 / 829
页数:17
相关论文
共 184 条
[1]  
Adams D. D., 1988, ARCH HYDROBIOL BEIH, V31, P319
[2]  
Allan JD, 2021, Stream ecology: Structure and function of running waters
[3]  
[Anonymous], RIVER STREAM ECOSYST
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1987, FOREST SOILS NUTR CY
[5]  
[Anonymous], IAHS PUBL
[6]  
[Anonymous], LIMNOLOGY AUSTR
[7]   NUTRIENT CYCLING IN A EUCALYPTUS-OBLIQUA-(LHERIT) FOREST .1. LITTER PRODUCTION AND NUTRIENT RETURN [J].
ATTIWILL, PM ;
GUTHRIE, HB ;
LEUNING, R .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 1978, 26 (01) :79-91
[8]   RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN WATER AVAILABILITY AND EUCALYPTUS-CAMALDULENSIS GROWTH IN A RIPARIAN FOREST [J].
BACON, PE ;
STONE, C ;
BINNS, DL ;
LESLIE, DJ ;
EDWARDS, DW .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1993, 150 (2-4) :541-561
[9]   Dissolved organic matter and phosphorus leached from fresh and 'terrestrially' aged river red gum leaves: implications for assessing river-floodplain interactions [J].
Baldwin, DS .
FRESHWATER BIOLOGY, 1999, 41 (04) :675-685
[10]  
BAYLEY P B, 1991, Regulated Rivers Research and Management, V6, P75, DOI 10.1002/rrr.3450060203