Pharmacodynamic interaction between propofol and remifentanil regarding hypnosis, tolerance of laryngoscopy, bispectral index, and electroencephalographic approximate entropy

被引:260
作者
Bouillon, TW
Bruhn, J
Radulescu, L
Andresen, C
Shafer, TJ
Cohane, C
Shafer, SL
机构
[1] Palo Alto Vet Affairs Hlth Care Syst, Anesthesiol Serv 112A, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[3] Univ Bern, Inselspital, Dept Anesthesia, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000542-200406000-00006
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background The purpose of this investigation was to describe the pharmacodynamic interaction between propofol and remifentanil for probability of no response to shaking and shouting, probability of no response to laryngoscopy, Bispectral Index (BIS), and electroencephalographic approximate entropy (AE). Methods: Twenty healthy volunteers received either propofol or remifentanil alone and then concurrently with a fixed concentration of remifentanil or propofol, respectively, via a target-controlled infusion. Responses to shaking and shouting and to laryngoscopy were assessed multiple times after allowing for plasma effect site equilibration. The raw electroencephalogram and BIS were recorded throughout the study, and AE was calculated off-line. Response surfaces were fit to the clinical response data using logistic regression or hierarchical response models. Response surfaces were also estimated for BIS and AE. Surfaces were visualized using three-dimensional rotations. Model parameters were estimated with NONMEM. Results: Remifentanil alone had no appreciable effect on response to shaking and shouting or response to laryngoscopy. Propofol could ablate both responses. Modest remifentanil concentrations dramatically reduced the concentrations of propofol required to ablate both responses. The hierarchical response surface described the data better than empirical logistic regression. BIS and AE are more sensitive to propofol than to remifentanil. Conclusions: Remifentanil alone is ineffective at ablating response to stimuli but demonstrates potent synergy with propofol. BIS and AE values corresponding to 95% probability of ablating response are influenced by the combination of propofol and remifentanil to achieve this endpoint, with higher propofol concentrations producing lower values for BIS and AE.
引用
收藏
页码:1353 / 1372
页数:20
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [21] Response surface modelling of the pharmacodynamic interaction between propofol and remifentanil in patients undergoing anaesthesia
    Choe, SangMin
    Choi, Byung-Moon
    Lee, Yong-Hun
    Lee, Soo-Han
    Lee, Eun-Kyung
    Kim, Ki-Seong
    Noh, Gyu-Jeong
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL PHARMACOLOGY AND PHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 44 (01): : 30 - 40
  • [22] Correlation and agreement between bispectral index and state entropy of the electroencephalogram during propofol anaesthesia
    Bonhomme, V.
    Deflandre, E.
    Hans, P.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2006, 97 (03) : 340 - 346
  • [23] Analysis of pharmacodynamic interaction of sevoflurane and propofol on bispectral index during general anaesthesia using a response surface model
    Diz, J. C.
    Del Rio, R.
    Lamas, A.
    Mendoza, M.
    Duran, M.
    Ferreira, L. M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2010, 104 (06) : 733 - 739
  • [24] Onset of propofol-induced burst suppression may be correctly detected as deepening of anaesthesia by approximate entropy but not by bispectral index
    Bruhn, J
    Bouillon, TW
    Shafer, SL
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2001, 87 (03) : 505 - 507
  • [25] Comparative evaluation of the Datex-Ohmeda S/5 Entropy Module and the bispectral index monitor during propofol-remifentanil anesthesia
    Schmidt, GN
    Bischoff, P
    Standl, T
    Hellstern, A
    Teuber, O
    Esch, JSA
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2004, 101 (06) : 1283 - 1290
  • [26] The Entropy Module® and Bispectral Index® as guidance for propofol-remifentanil anaesthesia in combination with regional anaesthesia compared with a standard clinical practice group
    Ellerkmann, R. K.
    Soehle, M.
    Riese, G.
    Zinserling, J.
    Wirz, S.
    Hoeft, A.
    Bruhn, J.
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 2010, 38 (01) : 159 - 166
  • [27] The effects of ketamine and rocuronium on the A-line® auditory evoked potential index, Bispectral Index, and spectral entropy monitor during steady state propofol and remifentanil anesthesia
    Vereecke, Hugo E. M.
    Vanluchene, Ann L.
    Mortier, Eric P.
    Everaert, Karel
    Struys, Michel M. R. F.
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2006, 105 (06) : 1122 - 1134
  • [28] Comparison of haemodynamic- and electroencephalographic-monitored effects evoked by four combinations of effect-site concentrations of propofol and remifentanil, yielding a predicted tolerance to laryngoscopy of 90%
    van den Berg, J. P.
    Absalom, A. R.
    Venema, A. M.
    Kalmar, A. F.
    Van Amsterdam, K.
    Hannivoort, L. N.
    Proost, J. H.
    Meier, S.
    Scheeren, T. W. L.
    Struys, M. M. R. F.
    Vereecke, H. E. M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING, 2021, 35 (04) : 815 - 825
  • [29] Comparison of haemodynamic- and electroencephalographic-monitored effects evoked by four combinations of effect-site concentrations of propofol and remifentanil, yielding a predicted tolerance to laryngoscopy of 90%
    J. P. van den Berg
    A. R. Absalom
    A. M. Venema
    A. F. Kalmar
    K. Van Amsterdam
    L. N. Hannivoort
    J. H. Proost
    S. Meier
    T. W. L. Scheeren
    M. M. R. F. Struys
    H. E. M. Vereecke
    Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 2021, 35 : 815 - 825