Road freight transport decoupling: A comparative analysis between the United Kingdom and Spain

被引:51
作者
Alises, Ana [1 ]
Manuel Vassallo, Jose [1 ]
Felipe Guzman, Andres [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Madrid, Transport Res Ctr TRANSYT, ETSI Caminos Canales & Puertos, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
关键词
Road freight transport; Decoupling; Economic structure; Road freight transport intensity; ECONOMIC-GROWTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.01.013
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Economic growth has traditionally been linked to road freight transport demand, leading to a steady rise in social and environmental impacts. Concern about this problem has caused the EU to promote a decoupling strategy aimed at boosting sustainable development in European countries by improving the efficiency of transport systems without curbing economic growth. Over the last few years empirical evidence in some countries such as the United Kingdom has shown an increase in GDP while the volume of road freight traffic has remained stable or even decreased. This paper compares recent decoupling trends by analyzing the evolution of road tonne-kms/GDP relationship in the United Kingdom and Spain from 1999 to 2007. This comparison seeks to identify the main differences and key drivers of decoupling in both countries. We first provide an overview of the divergences between both economic structures and levels of road transport intensity. Then we conduct a decomposition analysis in order to identify the variables that explain the evolution of truck traffic per unit of GDP in each country. The results show that the increasing share of services in GDP has substantially contributed to decreasing road transport demand in both cases. Changes in road transport intensity due to improvements in logistic and supply chain management have been more successful in the UK than in Spain. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:186 / 193
页数:8
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Ahman M., 2004, report no: 5370
[2]  
[Anonymous], AN LINKS TRANSP EC G
[3]  
Arvis J-F., 2007, CONNECTING COMPETE T
[4]  
Banister D., 2002, European Journal of Transport Infrastructure Research, V2, P161, DOI [10.18757/EJTIR.2002.2.4.3721, DOI 10.18757/EJTIR.2002.2.4.3721]
[5]  
Bennathan E., 1992, POLICY RES WORKING P
[6]  
Department for Transport, TRANSP STAT GREAT BR
[7]  
Dietzenbacher E., 1997, Prices, Growth and Cycles, P108
[8]  
EU (European Commission), 2003, FREIGHT TRANSP INT P
[9]  
European Commission, 2001, CIDAS SUST DEV STRAT
[10]  
European Commission, 2001, White Paper: European Transport Policy for 2010: Time to Decide