Exploring cognitive style and task-specific preferences for process representations

被引:40
作者
Figl, Kathrin [1 ]
Recker, Jan [2 ]
机构
[1] WU Vienna Univ Econ & Business, Inst Informat Syst & New Media, Welthandelspl 1,Bldg D2, A-1020 Vienna, Austria
[2] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Informat Syst, Off P-820 Gardens Point Campus,2 George St, Brisbane, Qld 4000, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Conceptual modeling; Business process modeling; Representation forms; Model evaluation; User preferences; Cognitive style; VISUALIZATION ABILITIES; OBJECT; COMPREHENSION; DESIRABILITY; CREATIVITY; COMPLEXITY; IMAGERY; MODELS; IMPACT; GRAPHS;
D O I
10.1007/s00766-014-0210-2
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Process models describe someone's understanding of processes. Processes can be described using unstructured, semi-formal or diagrammatic representation forms. These representations are used in a variety of task settings, ranging from understanding processes to executing or improving processes, with the implicit assumption that the chosen representation form will be appropriate for all task settings. We explore the validity of this assumption by examining empirically the preference for different process representation forms depending on the task setting and cognitive style of the user. Based on data collected from 120 business school students, we show that preferences for process representation formats vary dependent on application purpose and cognitive styles of the participants. However, users consistently prefer diagrams over other representation formats. Our research informs a broader research agenda on task-specific applications of process modeling. We offer several recommendations for further research in this area.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 85
页数:23
相关论文
共 87 条
[1]   Do you see what I see? The effect of members' cognitive styles on team processes and errors in task execution [J].
Aggarwal, Ishani ;
Woolley, Anita Williams .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2013, 122 (01) :92-99
[2]  
Akin O., 1998, AUTOMAT CONSTR, V7, P123, DOI [10.1016/S0926-5805(97)00057-5, DOI 10.1016/S0926-5805(97)00057-5]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2001, QUALITATIVE RES METH
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Business process management, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-33143-5
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2001, APPL MULTIVARIATE ST
[6]   Factors and measures of business process modelling: model building through a multiple case study [J].
Bandara, W ;
Gable, GG ;
Rosemann, M .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2005, 14 (04) :347-360
[7]   A comparative study of measures of partial knowledge in multiple-choice tests [J].
BenSimon, A ;
Budescu, DV ;
Nevo, B .
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1997, 21 (01) :65-88
[8]   Object-spatial imagery: New self-report imagery questionnaire [J].
Blajenkova, O ;
Kozhevnikov, M ;
Motes, MA .
APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 20 (02) :239-263
[9]   The New Object-Spatial-Verbal Cognitive Style Model: Theory and Measurement [J].
Blazhenkova, Olesya ;
Kozhevnikov, Maria .
APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 23 (05) :638-663
[10]  
Blumberg R., 2003, DM Review, V13, P42