Eating Behavior in Response to Food-Cue Exposure: Examining the Cue-Reactivity and Counteractive-Control Models

被引:44
作者
Coelho, Jennifer S. [1 ]
Jansen, Anita [1 ]
Roefs, Anne [1 ]
Nederkoom, Chantal [1 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Fac Psychol, Dept Clin Psychol Sci, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
food Cue; cue reactivity; counteractive control; intake; weight concerns; DIETARY RESTRAINT; UNRESTRAINED EATERS; TEMPTATION; HUNGER; SCALES; DISINHIBITION; PALATABILITY; RESTRICTION; SPECIFICITY; CONSUMPTION;
D O I
10.1037/a0013610
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Many studies have demonstrated that those high in weight-related concerns cat more after food-cue exposure, which is consistent with predictions of the cue reactivity model. However, the Counteractive-control model predicts that exposure to fattening foods activates dieting-related goals and behavior in weight-concerned individuals. Although these models seem incongruous, the authors hypothesized that the salience of the cue could represent I critical factor in determining which model is activated. The authors predicted that attending to salient food cues would result in increased intake (cue reactivity) in individuals with high weight related concern,,, whereas incidental food-cue exposure would result in decreased intake (counteractive control), relative to control exposure. The author,, employed 13 (attended vs. incidental vs. control cue) X 2 (low vs. high weight-related concerns) design. As expected, participants with high weight-related concerns who attended to a food cue ate more than did both those with high weight related concerns in the control condition and those with low weight-related concerns in the attended-cue condition; however, intake of individuals with high weight-related concerns who were exposed to the incidental cue did not differ from that of those in the control condition. The manner of food-cue presentation may be a critical factor in determining eating behavior.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 139
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Resistance and susceptibility to weight gain: Individual variability in response to a high-fat diet [J].
Blundell, JE ;
Stubbs, RJ ;
Golding, C ;
Croden, F ;
Alam, R ;
Whybrow, S ;
Le Noury, J ;
Lawton, CL .
PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 2005, 86 (05) :614-622
[2]   The role of exposure with response prevention in the cognitive-behavioural therapy for bulimia nervosa [J].
Bulik, CM ;
Sullivan, PF ;
Carter, FA ;
McIntosh, VV ;
Joyce, PR .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 1998, 28 (03) :611-623
[3]  
COELHO JS, 2008, WAKE UP SMELL COOKIE
[4]   EFFECTS OF RESTRAINT, MONITORING, AND STIMULUS SALIENCE ON EATING BEHAVIOR [J].
COLLINS, JE .
ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 1978, 3 (3-4) :197-204
[5]   EMOTIONAL AROUSAL AND OVEREATING IN RESTRAINED EATERS [J].
COOLS, J ;
SCHOTTE, DE ;
MCNALLY, RJ .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 101 (02) :348-351
[6]   STIMULUS-INDUCED EATING WHEN SATIATED [J].
CORNELL, CE ;
RODIN, J ;
WEINGARTEN, H .
PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 1989, 45 (04) :695-704
[7]   The specificity of restrained versus unrestrained eaters' responses to food cues: general desire to eat, or craving for the cued food? [J].
Fedoroff, I ;
Polivy, J ;
Herman, CP .
APPETITE, 2003, 41 (01) :7-13
[8]   The effect of pre-exposure to food cues on the eating behavior of restrained and unrestrained eaters [J].
Fedoroff, IC ;
Polivy, J ;
Herman, CP .
APPETITE, 1997, 28 (01) :33-47
[9]   Leading us not unto temptation: Momentary allurements elicit overriding goal activation [J].
Fishbach, A ;
Friedman, RS ;
Kruglanski, AW .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 84 (02) :296-309
[10]   Emotional distress and disinhibited eating: The role of self [J].
Heatherton, TF ;
Striepe, M ;
Wittenberg, L .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 1998, 24 (03) :301-313