IDENTIFICATION AND EVALUATION OF THE CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS IN LITHUANIA: AHP APPROACH

被引:126
作者
Gudiene, Neringa [1 ]
Banaitis, Audrius [1 ]
Podvezko, Valentinas [2 ]
Banaitiene, Nerija [1 ]
机构
[1] Vilnius Gediminas Tech Univ, Fac Civil Engn, Dept Construct Econ & Property Management, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania
[2] Vilnius Gediminas Tech Univ, Fac Fundamental Sci, Dept Math Stat, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania
关键词
critical success factors; construction project; AHP; ranking; Lithuania; project success; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; COPRAS-G METHODS; MANAGEMENT; PERFORMANCE; DECISION; SUPPORT; TECHNOLOGY; KNOWLEDGE; SELECTION; STRATEGY;
D O I
10.3846/13923730.2014.914082
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This paper proposes the Analytic Hierarchy Process (ATP) as a tool to rank different critical success factors (CSFs) for construction projects in Lithuania. Considering the current lack of understanding of CSFs within the local context, this study is one of the first attempts to gain an understanding of the CSFs in the local industry. Our study revealed that, for construction projects in Lithuania, clear and realistic project goals, project planning, the project manager's competence, relevant past experience of the project management/team, the competence of the project management/team, clear and precise goals/objectives of the client, the project's value, the project's complexity and uniqueness, the project manager's experience, and the client's ability to make timely decisions are the top-ranking CSFs. In view of these findings, the study highlighted the key areas for successful implementation of construction projects in Lithuania.
引用
收藏
页码:350 / 359
页数:10
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
Ahmed R, 2013, INT J ADV COMPUT SC, V4, P1
[2]   Critical success factors influencing safety program performance in Thai construction projects [J].
Aksorn, Thanet ;
Hadikusumo, B. H. W. .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2008, 46 (04) :709-727
[3]  
Al Haadir S., 2011, Procedia Engineering, V14, P148, DOI [DOI 10.1016/J.PR0ENG.2011.07.017, 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.017, DOI 10.1016/J.PROENG.2011.07.017]
[4]   Future criteria for success of building projects in Malaysia [J].
Al-Tmeemy, Samiaah M. Hassen M. ;
Abdul-Rahman, Hamzah ;
Harun, Zakaria .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2011, 29 (03) :337-348
[5]   The impact of contractors' attributes on construction project success: A post construction evaluation [J].
Alzahrani, Jaman I. ;
Emsley, Margaret W. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2013, 31 (02) :313-322
[6]   Safety risk assessment using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) during planning and budgeting of construction projects [J].
Aminbakhsh, Saman ;
Gunduz, Murat ;
Sonmez, Rifat .
JOURNAL OF SAFETY RESEARCH, 2013, 46 :99-105
[7]  
[Anonymous], MIT SLOAN MANAGEMENT
[8]   Evaluating the construction methods of cold-formed steel structures in reconstructing the areas damaged in natural crises, using the methods AHP and COPRAS-G [J].
Bitarafan, M. ;
Hashemkhani Zolfani, S. ;
Arefi, S. L. ;
Zavadskas, E. K. .
ARCHIVES OF CIVIL AND MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2012, 12 (03) :360-367
[9]   A FUZZY MULTIPLE CRITERIA COMPARISON OF TECHNOLOGY VALUATION METHODS FOR THE NEW MATERIALS DEVELOPMENT [J].
Cheng, An-Chin .
TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY, 2013, 19 (03) :397-408
[10]   Bidding strategy to support decision-making by integrating fuzzy AHP and regression-based simulation [J].
Chou, Jui-Sheng ;
Anh-Duc Pham ;
Wang, Hsin .
AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2013, 35 :517-527