Monte Carlo calculation of beam quality correction factors in proton beams using PENH

被引:31
作者
Goma, Carles [1 ,2 ]
Sterpin, Edmond [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Lab Expt Radiotherapy, Dept Oncol, Leuven, Belgium
[2] Hosp Clin Barcelona, Dept Radiat Oncol, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Catholic Univ Louvain, Ctr Mol Imaging Radiotherapy & Oncol, Inst Rech Expt & Clin, Brussels, Belgium
关键词
radiation dosimetry; proton therapy; beam quality correction factors; Monte Carlo simulation; IONIZATION-CHAMBER DOSIMETRY; MV PHOTON; SIMULATION; PENELOPE; K(Q); CONFIGURATION; CONSISTENCY; ALGORITHM; TRANSPORT;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6560/ab3b94
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
This work calculates beam quality correction factors (k(Q)) in both modulated and unmodulated proton beams using the Monte Carlo (MC) code PENH. The latest ICRU 90 recommendations on key data for ionizing-radiation dosimetry were adopted to calculate the electronic stopping powers and to select the mean energy to create an ion pair in dry air (W-air). For modulated proton beams, k(Q) factors were calculated in the middle of a spread-out Bragg peak, while for monoenergetic proton beams they were calculated at the entrance region. Fifteen ionization chambers were simulated. The k(Q) factors calculated in this work were found to agree within 0.8% or better with the experimental data reported in the literature. For some ionization chambers, the simulation of proton nuclear interactions were found to have an effect on the k(Q) factors of up to 1%; while for some others, perturbation factors were found to differ from unity by more than 1%. In addition, the combined standard uncertainty in the MC calculated k(Q) factors in proton beams was estimated to be of the order of 1%. Thus, the results of this work seem to indicate that: (i) the simulation of proton nuclear interactions should be included in the MC calculation of k(Q) factors in proton beams, (ii) perturbation factors in proton beams should not be neglected, and (iii) the detailed MC simulation of ionization chambers allows for an accurate and precise calculation of k(Q) factors in clinical proton beams.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Secondary neutron and photon dose in proton therapy [J].
Agosteo, S ;
Birattari, C ;
Caravaggio, M ;
Silari, M ;
Tosi, G .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1998, 48 (03) :293-305
[2]   GEANT4-a simulation toolkit [J].
Agostinelli, S ;
Allison, J ;
Amako, K ;
Apostolakis, J ;
Araujo, H ;
Arce, P ;
Asai, M ;
Axen, D ;
Banerjee, S ;
Barrand, G ;
Behner, F ;
Bellagamba, L ;
Boudreau, J ;
Broglia, L ;
Brunengo, A ;
Burkhardt, H ;
Chauvie, S ;
Chuma, J ;
Chytracek, R ;
Cooperman, G ;
Cosmo, G ;
Degtyarenko, P ;
Dell'Acqua, A ;
Depaola, G ;
Dietrich, D ;
Enami, R ;
Feliciello, A ;
Ferguson, C ;
Fesefeldt, H ;
Folger, G ;
Foppiano, F ;
Forti, A ;
Garelli, S ;
Giani, S ;
Giannitrapani, R ;
Gibin, D ;
Cadenas, JJG ;
González, I ;
Abril, GG ;
Greeniaus, G ;
Greiner, W ;
Grichine, V ;
Grossheim, A ;
Guatelli, S ;
Gumplinger, P ;
Hamatsu, R ;
Hashimoto, K ;
Hasui, H ;
Heikkinen, A ;
Howard, A .
NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2003, 506 (03) :250-303
[3]   Consistency in reference radiotherapy dosimetry: resolution of an apparent conundrum when 60Co is the reference quality for charged-particle and photon beams [J].
Andreo, Pedro ;
Wulff, Joerg ;
Burns, David T. ;
Palmans, Hugo .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2013, 58 (19) :6593-6621
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Technical Reports series
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Evaluation of Measurement Data - Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement, P100, DOI DOI 10.1373/CLINCHCM.2003.030528
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2000, icru Report
[7]   GAMOS: A framework to do GEANT4 simulations in different physics fields with an user-friendly interface [J].
Arce, Pedro ;
Ignacio Lagares, Juan ;
Harkness, Laura ;
Perez-Astudillo, Daniel ;
Canadas, Mario ;
Rato, Pedro ;
de Prado, Maria ;
Abreu, Yamiel ;
de Lorenzo, Gianluca ;
Kolstein, Machiel ;
Diaz, Angelina .
NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2014, 735 :304-313
[8]   Comparison of penh, fluka, and Geant4/topas for absorbed dose calculations in air cavities representing ionization chambers in high-energy photon and proton beams [J].
Baumann, Kilian-Simon ;
Horst, Felix ;
Zink, Klemens ;
Goma, Carles .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (10) :4639-4653
[9]   The FLUKA Code: Developments and Challenges for High Energy and Medical Applications [J].
Boehlen, T. T. ;
Cerutti, F. ;
Chin, M. P. W. ;
Fosso, A. ;
Ferrari, A. ;
Ortega, P. G. ;
Mairani, A. ;
Sala, P. R. ;
Smirnov, G. ;
Vlachoudisl, V. .
NUCLEAR DATA SHEETS, 2014, 120 :211-214
[10]  
Burns DT., 2003, CALCULATION KWALL 60, P40