Evaluation mechanism for structural robustness of supply chain considering disruption propagation

被引:81
作者
Han, Jihee [1 ]
Shin, KwangSup [2 ]
机构
[1] Korea Univ, Dept Ind Management Engn, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Incheon Natl Univ, Grad Sch Logist, Inchon, South Korea
关键词
supply chain risk management; structural robustness; disruption management; risk propagation; social network analysis; RISK; MANAGEMENT; COORDINATION; UNCERTAINTY; RESILIENCE; DESIGN; MODELS;
D O I
10.1080/00207543.2015.1047977
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This paper aims to develop a novel evaluation mechanism for assessing the structural robustness of a supply chain considering disruption propagation. Disruption propagation means that the impact of risks propagates to the whole supply chain along the connected structure. Based on the propagation model, a structural robustness evaluation mechanism is devised by integrating two quantitative metrics, average path length and in degree-out degree. To validate the proposed mechanism, the result of the quantitative assessment of the structural robustness on random networks is compared with the probability of network disruption due to the random risk. From the results of the statistical verifications and sensitivity analysis, it can be said that the proposed mechanism is better at explaining the robustness of a supply chain. In other words, all components of a network, such as nodes and arcs, and their relationships should be considered altogether, in order to more accurately measure the robustness. It may be possible to apply the proposed mechanism to the very first step of designing the supply chain. Especially, in the case of it being hard to redesign a supply chain structure after practically launching and operating the designed network, the proposed mechanism may be utilised to verify whether the planned supply chain is robust to risks or not.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 151
页数:17
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], MIT SLOAN MANAGEMENT
  • [2] Measuring supply chain risk: Predicting motor carriers' ability to withstand disruptive environmental change using conjoint analysis
    Atwater, Craig
    Gopalan, Ram
    Lancioni, Richard
    Hunt, James
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2014, 48 : 360 - 378
  • [3] Measuring the supply chain risk and vulnerability in frequency space
    Bogataj, David
    Bogataj, Marija
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2007, 108 (1-2) : 291 - 301
  • [4] ON SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS IN A SUPPLY CHAIN CONTEXT
    Borgatti, Stephen P.
    Li, Xun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT, 2009, 45 (02) : 5 - 22
  • [5] A social network-based organizational model for improving knowledge management in supply chains
    Capo-Vicedo, Josep
    Mula, Josefa
    Capo, Jordi
    [J]. SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2011, 16 (04) : 284 - 293
  • [6] Demand disruption and coordination of the supply chain with a dominant retailer
    Chen, Kebing
    Xiao, Tiaojun
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2009, 197 (01) : 225 - 234
  • [7] Supply chain risk analysis with mean-variance models: a technical review
    Chiu, Chun-Hung
    Choi, Tsan-Ming
    [J]. ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2016, 240 (02) : 489 - 507
  • [8] Modeling risk in a Design for Supply Chain problem
    Claypool, Erin
    Norman, Bryan A.
    Needy, Kim LaScola
    [J]. COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2014, 78 : 44 - 54
  • [9] CENTRALITY IN SOCIAL NETWORKS CONCEPTUAL CLARIFICATION
    FREEMAN, LC
    [J]. SOCIAL NETWORKS, 1979, 1 (03) : 215 - 239
  • [10] Reliability evaluation and adjustment of supply chain network design with demand fluctuations
    Hsu, Chaug-Ing
    Li, Hui-Chieh
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2011, 132 (01) : 131 - 145