A SOLAR CYCLE LOST IN 1793-1800: EARLY SUNSPOT OBSERVATIONS RESOLVE THE OLD MYSTERY

被引:85
作者
Usoskin, Ilya G. [1 ]
Mursula, Kalevi [2 ]
Arlt, Rainer [3 ]
Kovaltsov, Gennady A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oulu, Sodankyla Geophys Observ, Oulu Unit, Oulu, Finland
[2] Univ Oulu, Dept Phys Sci, Oulu, Finland
[3] Astrophys Inst Potsdam, D-14482 Potsdam, Germany
[4] RAS, AF Ioffe Phys Tech Inst, St Petersburg 194021, Russia
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Sun: activity; sunspots; MAUNDER MINIMUM; MAGNETIC-FIELD; SUN; RECONSTRUCTION; CLIMATE; LENGTH;
D O I
10.1088/0004-637X/700/2/L154
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Because of the lack of reliable sunspot observations, the quality of the sunspot number series is poor in the late 18th century, leading to the abnormally long solar cycle (1784-1799) before the Dalton minimum. Using the newly recovered solar drawings by the 18-19th century observers Staudacher and Hamilton, we construct the solar butterfly diagram, i.e., the latitudinal distribution of sunspots in the 1790s. The sudden, systematic occurrence of sunspots at high solar latitudes in 1793-1796 unambiguously shows that a new cycle started in 1793, which was lost in the traditional Wolf sunspot series. This finally confirms the existence of the lost cycle that has been proposed earlier, thus resolving an old mystery. This Letter brings the attention of the scientific community to the need of revising the sunspot series in the 18th century. The presence of a new short, asymmetric cycle implies changes and constraints to sunspot cycle statistics, solar activity predictions, and solar dynamo theories, as well as for solar-terrestrial relations.
引用
收藏
页码:L154 / L157
页数:4
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Digitization of sunspot drawings by Staudacher in 1749-1796 [J].
Arlt, R. .
SOLAR PHYSICS, 2008, 247 (02) :399-410
[2]   The solar observations at Armagh Observatory in 1795-1797 [J].
Arlt, R. .
ASTRONOMISCHE NACHRICHTEN, 2009, 330 (04) :311-316
[3]   The Butterfly Diagram in the Eighteenth Century [J].
Arlt, R. .
SOLAR PHYSICS, 2009, 255 (01) :143-153
[4]   Solar dynamo surface waves in the presence of a primordial magnetic field: A 30 gauss upper limit in the solar core [J].
Boruta, N .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 458 (02) :832-849
[5]   On solar cycle predictions and reconstructions [J].
Brajsa, R. ;
Woehl, H. ;
Hanslmeier, A. ;
Verbanac, G. ;
Ruzdjak, D. ;
Cliver, E. ;
Svalgaard, L. ;
Roth, M. .
ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2009, 496 (03) :855-861
[6]   THE INCLINATION OF THE HELIOMAGNETIC EQUATOR AND THE PRESENCE OF AN INCLINED RELIC FIELD IN THE SUN [J].
BRAVO, S ;
STEWART, G .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 446 (01) :431-434
[7]   Dynamo Models of the Solar Cycle [J].
Charbonneau, Paul .
LIVING REVIEWS IN SOLAR PHYSICS, 2010, 7 (03)
[8]   IS THERE A CHRONOMETER HIDDEN DEEP IN SUN [J].
DICKE, RH .
NATURE, 1978, 276 (5689) :676-680
[9]   Predicting the strength of solar cycle 24 using a flux-transport dynamo-based tool [J].
Dikpati, M ;
de Toma, G ;
Gilman, PA .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2006, 33 (05)
[10]   MAUNDER MINIMUM [J].
EDDY, JA .
SCIENCE, 1976, 192 (4245) :1189-1202