共 50 条
Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonist-Based Triple Regimens in Preventing Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: A Network Meta-Analysis
被引:9
作者:
Zhang, Yaxiong
[1
,3
,4
]
Yang, Yunpeng
[1
,3
,4
]
Zhang, Zhonghan
[1
,3
,4
]
Fang, Wenfeng
[1
,3
,4
]
Kang, Shiyang
[2
,3
,4
]
Luo, Youli
[5
]
Sheng, Jin
[1
,3
,4
]
Zhan, Jianhua
[1
,3
,4
]
Hong, Shaodong
[1
,3
,4
]
Huang, Yan
[1
,3
,4
]
Zhou, Ningning
[1
,3
,4
]
Zhao, Hongyun
[1
,3
,4
]
Zhang, Li
[1
,3
,4
]
机构:
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Ctr Canc, Dept Med Oncol, 651 Dongfeng Rd East, Guangzhou 510060, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Ctr Canc, Dept Anesthesiol, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] State Key Lab Oncol South China, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Collaborat Innovat Ctr Canc Med, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[5] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 5, Dept Med Oncol, Zhuhai, Peoples R China
来源:
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE
|
2017年
/
109卷
/
02期
关键词:
MODERATELY EMETOGENIC CHEMOTHERAPY;
HIGH-DOSE CISPLATIN;
PHASE-III TRIAL;
PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL;
DOUBLE-BLIND;
GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER;
CASOPITANT MESYLATE;
ANTIEMETIC THERAPY;
BREAST-CANCER;
APREPITANT;
D O I:
10.1093/jnci/djw217
中图分类号:
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号:
100214 ;
摘要:
Background: Neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists (NK-1RAs) are widely used for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) control in patients with highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) and/or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC). Whether the efficacy and toxicity of antiemesis are different among various NK-1RA-based triple regimens is unknown. Methods: Data of complete responses (CRs) in the acute, delayed, and overall phases and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were extracted from electronic databases. Efficacy and toxicity were integrated by pairwise and networkmeta-analyses. Results: Thirty-six trials involving 18 889 patients using triple regimens (NK-1RA+serotonin receptor antagonists [5HT3RA] + dexamethasone) or duplex regimen (5HT3RA+dexamethasone) to control CINV were included in the analysis. Different NK-1RA-based triple regimens shared equivalent effect on CRs. In patients with HEC, almost all triple regimens showed statistically significantly higher CRs than duplex regimen (odds ratio [OR](duplex/triple) = 0.47-0.66). However, in patients with MEC, only aprepitant-based triple regimen showed better effect than duplex regimen statistically significantly in CRs (ORduplex/triple = 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.34 to 0.68). No statistically significant difference of TRAEs was found among different triple regimens. Palonosetron-based triple regimens were equivalent to first-generation 5HT3RAs-based triple regimens for CRs. Moreover, different doses of dexamethasone plus NK-1RA and 5HT3RA showed no statistically significant difference in CRs. Conclusions: Different NK-1RAs-based triple regimens shared equivalent effect on CINV control. Various triple regimens had superior antiemetic effect than duplex regimen in patients with HEC. Only aprepitant-based triple regimen showed better CINV control compared with duplex regimen in patients receiving MEC. Palonosetron and first-generation 5HT3RAs might share equivalent CINV control in the combination of NK-1RAs and dexamethasone. Lower doses of dexamethasone might be applied when used with NK-1RAs and 5HT3RAs.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条