Chemoradiotherapy versus chemotherapy as adjuvant treatment for localized gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis

被引:3
|
作者
Girardi, Daniel M. [1 ]
de Lima, Mariana A. [2 ]
Pereira, Gabriel C. B. [3 ]
Negrao, Marcelo V. [2 ]
Lopez, Rossana V. M. [2 ]
Capareli, Fernanda C. [2 ]
Sabbaga, Jorge [2 ]
Hoff, Paulo Marcelo G. [2 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Sirio Libanes, Dept Oncol, SGAS 613,Conjunto E Lote 95, BR-70200001 Brasilia, DF, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Med, Inst Canc Estado Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Oncoclinica, Macapa, Brazil
来源
BMC CANCER | 2018年 / 18卷
关键词
Gastric cancer; Adjuvant; Propensity score; Chemoradiotherapy; Chemotherapy; MISMATCH-REPAIR DEFICIENCY; LYMPH-NODE DISSECTION; PHASE-III TRIAL; OPEN-LABEL; GASTROESOPHAGEAL JUNCTION; PD-1; BLOCKADE; FOLLOW-UP; ADENOCARCINOMA; CAPECITABINE; OXALIPLATIN;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-018-4305-x
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Treatment of localized gastric cancer (LGC) consists of surgical resection followed by adjuvant treatment. Both chemoradiation (CRT) and chemotherapy (CT) regimens have shown benefit in survival outcomes versus observation. However, there are few data comparing these approaches. Methods: This study included consecutive patients with LGC treated at Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo (ICESP) from 2012 to 2015. CRT was based on the INT-0116 regimen and CT consisted of a platinum and fluoropyrimidine doublet. Treatment choice was based on physician preference. Toxicity was evaluated for every cycle. Overall survival (OS) analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed to minimize selection bias. Results: A total of 309 patients were evaluated, 227 in CRT group and 82 in CT group. The most prevalent grade 3/4 toxicities in CRT and CT groups were: nausea/vomiting (9.25 vs 4.9%), fatigue (9.3% vs 2.4%), mucositis (4.4% vs 1.2%), neutropenia (37.8% vs 20.9%), febrile neutropenia (3.9% vs 0%), anemia (4.3% vs 6.1%), thrombocytopenia (2.6% vs 4.9%), neuropathy (0 vs 2.4%) and hand-foot syndrome (0.4% vs 2.4%). Two grade 5 toxicities (febrile neutropenia and anemia) occurred in CRT group. There was no difference in the pattern of recurrence. After a median follow-up of 23.5 months (CRT) and 20.6 months (CT), there was no difference in OS between groups. Conclusions: CT and CRT present similar efficacy and tolerability as adjuvant treatment for LGC.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Chemoradiotherapy versus chemotherapy as adjuvant treatment for localized gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis
    Daniel M. Girardi
    Mariana A. de Lima
    Gabriel C. B. Pereira
    Marcelo V. Negrão
    Rossana V. M. López
    Fernanda C. Capareli
    Jorge Sabbaga
    Paulo Marcelo G. Hoff
    BMC Cancer, 18
  • [2] Adjuvant chemotherapy versus preoperative chemotherapy for gastric cancer treated with curative-intent resection: A propensity score-matched analysis
    Pereira, Marina Alessandra
    Ramos, Marcus Fernando Kodama Pertille
    Dias, Andre Roncon
    Yagi, Osmar Kenji
    Charruf, Amir Zeide
    de Castria, Tiago Biachi
    Ribeiro Jr, Ulysses
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 130 (04) : 724 - 733
  • [3] Induction versus adjuvant chemotherapy combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis
    Tang, Si-Qi
    Xu, Cheng
    Wang, Xiao-Shuai
    Tang, Ling-Long
    Li, Wen-Fei
    Chen, Lei
    Mao, Yan-Ping
    Guo, Rui
    Liu, Qing
    Sun, Ying
    Ma, Jun
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 105
  • [4] Effect of Early Adjuvant Chemotherapy on Survival of Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients: a Propensity Score-matched Analysis
    Lee, Yoontaek
    Min, Sa-Hong
    Park, Ki Bum
    Park, Young Suk
    Kim, Ji-Won
    Ahn, Sang-Hoon
    Kim, Jin Won
    Park, Do Joong
    Lee, Keun-Wook
    Kim, Hyung-Ho
    JOURNAL OF GASTRIC CANCER, 2018, 18 (01) : 58 - 68
  • [5] Adjuvant Chemotherapy vs Postoperative Observation Following Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy and Resection in Gastroesophageal Cancer A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
    Mokdad, Ali A.
    Yopp, Adam C.
    Polanco, Patricio M.
    Mansour, John C.
    Reznik, Scott I.
    Heitjan, Daniel F.
    Choti, Michael A.
    Minter, Rebecca R.
    Wang, Sam C.
    Porembka, Matthew R.
    JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2018, 4 (01) : 31 - 38
  • [6] Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy for node-positive esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis
    Wang, Qifeng
    Lang, Jinyi
    Li, Tao
    Peng, Lin
    Dai, Wei
    Jiang, Yinchun
    Xie, Tianpeng
    Fang, Qiang
    Wang, Yi
    Wu, Lei
    Cao, Bangrong
    Han, Yongtao
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 15 (01)
  • [7] Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy for node-positive esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis
    Qifeng Wang
    Jinyi Lang
    Tao Li
    Lin Peng
    Wei Dai
    Yinchun Jiang
    Tianpeng Xie
    Qiang Fang
    Yi Wang
    Lei Wu
    Bangrong Cao
    Yongtao Han
    Radiation Oncology, 15
  • [8] EXTREME VERSUS MODERATE HYPOFRACTIONATION FOR LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER: A PROPENSITY SCORE-MATCHED ANALYSIS
    Corrao, Giulia
    Marvaso, Giulia
    Ciardo, Delia
    Gandini, Sara
    Riva, Giulia
    Frigo, Emanuele
    Fodor, Cristiana
    Zerini, Dario
    Romanelli, Paola
    Comi, Stefania
    Cambria, Raffaella
    De Cobelli, Ottavio
    Orecchia, Roberto
    Jereczek-Fossa, Barbara Alicja
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2019, 39 (03) : 1545 - 1546
  • [9] Perioperative versus postoperative chemotherapy for gastric cancer: A propensity score matched analysis
    Kumar, Surendra
    Seshadri, Ramakrishnan Ayloor
    Trivadi, S. Ganesan
    Dhanushkodi, Manikandan
    Ellusamy, Hemanth Raj
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 16 (05) : E252 - E256
  • [10] Efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy for small bowel adenocarcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis
    Ecker, Brett L.
    McMillan, Matthew T.
    Datta, Jashodeep
    Mamtani, Ronac
    Giantonio, Bruce J.
    Dempsey, Daniel T.
    Fraker, Douglas L.
    Drebin, Jeffrey A.
    Karakousis, Giorgos C.
    Roses, Robert E.
    CANCER, 2016, 122 (05) : 693 - 701