Visual outcome comparison of unilateral versus bilateral implantation of apodized diffractive multifocal intralocular lenses after cataract extraction Prospective 6-month study

被引:40
作者
Cionni, Robert J.
Osher, Robert H.
Snyder, Michael E.
Nordlund, Michael L.
机构
关键词
MONOFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENSES; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; PREPRESBYOPIC PATIENTS; RESTOR; PERFORMANCE; EYE; SURGERY; REZOOM; ARRAY; IOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.02.018
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To evaluate the visual outcomes and patient satisfaction after unilateral implantation or stepwise bilateral implantation of an apodized diffractive multifocal intraocular lens (IOL). SETTING: Private practice, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA. METHODS: Patients requiring cataract surgery in 1 eye were recruited. AcrySof ReSTOR IOLs were implanted in 1 eye of patients with phakic contralateral eyes, patients with contralateral moncifocal IOLs, and patients with a contralateral multifocal IOL of the same model. Six months postoperatively, patients were assessed for visual acuity (31.0 cm, 50.0 cm, 4.0 m), contrast sensitivity, and stereopsis. Patients were surveyed for visual disturbances and lifestyle visual quality. RESULTS: Of unilateral multifocal IOL patients, 75% were satisfied with their vision (score 7.3 out of 10) and a majority (56% multifocal-phakic, 65% multifocal-monofocal) achieved spectacle independence. These values were slightly lower than values for bilateral multifocal patients (92% satisfied, 77% spectacle independent), but not at a statistically significant level. Mean overall patient satisfaction was statistically significantly different: 8.9 for bilateral patients versus 7.3 for unilateral patients. Objectively, significant differences favored bilateral implantation over unilateral implantation for stereopsis, uncorrected near visual acuity, and best corrected near and intermediate visual acuities. Contrast sensitivity was similar between groups in most cases. The incidence of halos was lower in unilateral patients (57%) than in bilateral patients (77%), although the difference did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Although unilateral implantation of a multifocal IOL provided patients with high levels of spectacle freedom and good visual acuity without compromising contrast sensitivity, overall clinical results favored bilateral implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009; 35:1033-1039 (C) 2009 ASCRS and ESCRS
引用
收藏
页码:1033 / 1039
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[21]   Visual performance of AcrySof ReSTOR apodized diffractive IOL: A prospective comparative trial [J].
Souza, Carlos E. ;
Muccioli, Cristina ;
Soriano, Eduardo S. ;
Chalita, Maria Regina ;
Oliveira, Filipi ;
Freitas, Lincoln L. ;
Meire, Luci P. ;
Tamaki, Celina ;
Belfort, Rubens, Jr. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2006, 141 (05) :827-832
[22]  
Souza CE, 2006, J REFRACT SURG, V22, P303
[23]   A prospective comparative study of the AMO ARRAY zonal-progressive multifocal silicone intraocular lens and a monofocal intraocular lens [J].
Steinert, RF ;
Aker, BL ;
Trentacost, DJ ;
Smith, PJ ;
Tarantino, N .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1999, 106 (07) :1243-1255
[24]   Visualization of the retinal image in an eye model with spherical and aspheric, diffractive, and refractive multifocal intraocular lenses [J].
Terwee, Thom ;
Weeber, Henk ;
van der Mooren, Marrie ;
Piers, Patricia .
JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2008, 24 (03) :223-232
[25]   Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity: AcrySof ReSTOR apodized diffractive versus AcrySof SA60AT monofocal intraocular lenses [J].
Vingolo, Enzo Maria ;
Grenga, PierLuigi ;
Iacobelli, Luca ;
Grenga, Roberto .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2007, 33 (07) :1244-1247
[26]   Longitudinal rates of cataract surgery [J].
Williams, Adrienne ;
Sloan, Frank A. ;
Lee, Paul P. .
ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2006, 124 (09) :1308-1314