Hounsfield Units on Computed Tomography Predict Calcium Stone Subtype Composition

被引:47
作者
Patel, Sutchin R.
Haleblian, George
Zabbo, August
Pareek, Gyan
机构
[1] Brown Univ, Dept Surg, Div Urol, Sect Minimally Invas Urol Surg, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[2] Brown Univ, Stone Therapy Ctr New England, Warren Alpert Med Sch, Providence, RI 02912 USA
关键词
Hounsfield units; Computed tomography; Stone composition; Calcium; Nephrolithiasis; SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY; URINARY CALCULI; HELICAL CT; CHEMICAL-COMPOSITION; IN-VITRO; ATTENUATION VALUES; COLLIMATION; WINDOWS;
D O I
10.1159/000230020
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Hounsfield unit (HU) determination of urinary stones on noncontrast computed tomography (NCCT) has been shown to predict stone composition. However, no in vivo studies have attempted to radiographically separate the various calcium stone compositions. We investigate the efficacy of HU measurement on NCCT to determine if it can differentiate the various calcium stone subtypes. Patients and Methods: Of the 684 patients who had undergone ureteroscopy at our institution from 1/2003 to 10/2007, 100 were identified with a documented NCCT, a chemical stone analysis and a stone size >5 mm but <2 cm. Results: Stone compositions were categorized as 100-80% calcium oxalate monohydrate (CaOMH) (n = 24), <80-60% CaOMH (n = 21), <60-50% CaOMH (n = 11) calcium oxalate dihydrate (CaODH) (n = 16), apatite (n = 9), brushite (n = 4), cystine (n = 2) and uric acid (n = 13). Mean HU were 879 +/- 230, 769 +/- 295, 717 +/- 304, and 517 +/- 203 for the 100-80% CaOMH, <80-60% CaOMH, <60-50% CaOMH and CaODH groups, respectively. The average HU for the apatite, brushite, cystine and uric acid groups were 844 +/- 346, 1,123 +/- 254, 550 +/- 74 and 338 +/- 145, respectively. The CaOMH groups together had a significantly higher HU than the CaODH group ( p < 0.05) and a significantly lower HU than the brushite group (p < 0.05). Conclusions: HU measurement of urinary stones on NCCT may be used to separate some calcium stone subtypes, specifically CaOMH and CaODH. This information may be useful in counseling patients on treatment options for patients requiring intervention. Copyright (C) 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 180
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] CHAUSSY CG, 1987, MONOGR UROL, V4, P80
  • [2] The efficacy of non-contrast helical computed tomography in the prediction of urinary stone composition in vivo
    Demirel, A
    Suma, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2003, 31 (01) : 1 - 5
  • [3] Spiral computed tomography:: Role in determination of chemical compositions of pure and mixed urinary stones-an in vitro study
    Deveci, S
    Coskun, M
    Tekin, MI
    Peskircioglu, L
    Tarhan, NÇ
    Özkardes, H
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2004, 64 (02) : 237 - 240
  • [4] CT and stone fragility
    Dretler, SP
    Spencer, BA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2001, 15 (01) : 31 - 36
  • [5] CT evaluation of urinary lithiasis
    Kenney, PJ
    [J]. RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2003, 41 (05) : 979 - +
  • [6] DETERMINATION OF THE CHEMICAL-COMPOSITION OF URINARY CALCULI BY COMPUTERIZED-TOMOGRAPHY
    MITCHESON, HD
    ZAMENHOF, RG
    BANKOFF, MS
    PRIEN, EL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1983, 130 (04) : 814 - 819
  • [7] Accurate determination of chemical composition of urinary calculi by spiral computerized tomography
    Mostafavi, MR
    Ernst, RD
    Saltzman, B
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 159 (03) : 673 - 675
  • [8] Hounsfield unit density in the determination of urinary stone composition
    Motley, G
    Dalrymple, N
    Keesling, C
    Fischer, J
    Harmon, W
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2001, 58 (02) : 170 - 173
  • [9] Determination of stone composition by noncontrast spiral computed tomography in the clinical setting
    Nakada, SY
    Hoff, DG
    Attai, S
    Heisey, D
    Blankenbaker, D
    Pozniak, M
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2000, 55 (06) : 816 - 819
  • [10] COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF URINARY CALCULI
    NEWHOUSE, JH
    PRIEN, EL
    AMIS, ES
    DRETLER, SP
    PFISTER, RC
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1984, 142 (03) : 545 - 548