Scaling up nature-based solutions for climate-change adaptation: Potential and benefits in three European cities

被引:57
作者
Cortinovis, Chiara [1 ,2 ]
Olsson, Peter [1 ]
Boke-Olen, Niklas [1 ]
Hedlund, Katarina [1 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Ctr Environm & Climate Sci, Solvegatan 37, S-22362 Lund, Sweden
[2] Humboldt Univ, Dept Geog, Rudower Chaussee 16, D-12489 Berlin, Germany
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Green roofs; Street trees; Urban parks; Permeable pavements; Scenarios; Runoff reduction; Heat mitigation; Carbon storage; Biodiversity potential; Greenness; URBAN GREEN-SPACE; OF-THE-ART; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; TRADE-OFFS; LAND-USE; AREAS; INFRASTRUCTURE; IMPLEMENTATION; MANCHESTER; MITIGATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127450
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Many exemplary projects have demonstrated that Nature-based Solutions (NBS) can contribute to climate change adaptation, but now the challenge is to scale up their use. Setting realistic policy goals requires knowing the amount of different NBS types that can fit in the urban space and the benefits that can be expected. This research aims to assess the potential for a full-scale implementation of NBS for climate-change adaptation in European cities, the expected benefits and co-benefits, and how these quantities relate to the urban structure of the cities. We selected three case studies: Barcelona (Spain), Malmo (Sweden), and Utrecht (the Netherlands), and developed six scenarios that simulate the current condition, the full-scale implementation of different NBS strategies (i.e., installing green roofs, de-sealing parking areas, enhancing vegetation in urban parks, and planting street trees), and a combination of them. Then we applied spatially-explicit methods to assess, for each scenario, two climate change-related benefits, i.e. heat mitigation and stormwater regulation, and three co benefits, namely carbon storage, biodiversity potential, and overall greenness. Finally, by breaking down the results per land use class, we investigated how the potential and benefits vary depending on the urban form. Most scenarios provide multiple benefits, but each one is characterized by a specific mix. In all cities, a full-scale deployment of green roofs shows the greatest potential to reduce runoff and increase biodiversity, while tree planting-either along streets or in urban parks- produces the greatest impact on heat mitigation and greenness. However, these results entail interventions of different size and in different locations. Planting street trees maximizes interventions in residential areas, but key opportunities for integrating most NBS types also lie in commercial and industrial areas. The results on the pros and cons of each scenario can support policy-makers in designing targeted NBS strategies for climate change adaptation.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 93 条
  • [1] Adjuntament the Barcelona, 2020, PROJ POP BARC BAS 20
  • [2] AEMet, 2021, STAND CLIM VAL
  • [3] The effects of urban patterns on ecosystem function
    Alberti, M
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REGIONAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2005, 28 (02) : 168 - 192
  • [4] Allen R.G., 2015, 2015 ASABE / IA Irrigation Symposium: Emerging Technologies for Sustainable Irrigation - A Tribute to the Career of Terry Howell, P1, DOI [10.13031/irrig.20152143511, DOI 10.13031/IRRIG.20152143511]
  • [5] Almassy D., 2018, URBAN NATURE ATLAS D
  • [6] Nexus between nature-based solutions, ecosystem services and urban challenges
    Almenar, Javier Babi
    Elliot, Thomas
    Rugani, Benedetto
    Philippe, Bodenan
    Gutierrez, Tomas Navarrete
    Sonnemann, Guido
    Geneletti, Davide
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2021, 100
  • [7] Green and Blue Spaces and Behavioral Development in Barcelona Schoolchildren: The BREATHE Project
    Amoly, Elmira
    Dadvand, Payam
    Forns, Joan
    Lopez-Vicente, Monica
    Basagana, Xavier
    Julvez, Jordi
    Alvarez-Pedrerol, Mar
    Nieuwenhuijsen, Mark J.
    Sunyer, Jordi
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2014, 122 (12) : 1351 - 1358
  • [8] Neighbourhood character affects the spatial extent and magnitude of the functional footprint of urban green infrastructure
    Andersson, Erik
    Haase, Dagmar
    Scheuer, Sebastian
    Wellmann, Thilo
    [J]. LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2020, 35 (07) : 1605 - 1618
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2012, GLOBAL SOIL ORGANIC
  • [10] [Anonymous], 1986, USDA NATURAL RESOURC, V55, P164