Safety and Benefits of Intraoperative Enteral Nutrition in Critically Ill Pediatric Burn Patients: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis

被引:5
作者
Hudson, Alexandra S. [1 ]
Morzycki, Alexander D. [2 ]
Wong, Joshua [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Div Pediat Gastroenterol, Dept Pediat, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Edmonton, AB, Canada
关键词
CARE; GUIDELINES; SUPPORT;
D O I
10.1093/jbcr/irac036
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Burn injuries significantly increase a patient's metabolic demand. Adequate nutrition is essential as an adjunct to recovery and reducing morbidity and mortality. In contrast to adults, this is especially important for pediatric patients who have limited reserves and are in a period of growth. Burn patients often require multiple anesthetic procedures that are accompanied by standard perioperative fasting periods that result in substantial nutritional interruptions. Continuous intraoperative feeding has been proposed as a solution, but there is no current consensus on its role and safety, particularly in the pediatric population. Thus, the goal of this study was to examine the safety and benefits of intraoperative nutrition in critically ill pediatric burn injured patients. A systematic review of MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted using the following terms: feeding or enteral or nutrition or fasting and adolescent or youth or pediatric or child or teen and burn or thermal injury or fire. The primary outcome was incidence of aspiration. Secondary outcomes included patient nutritional status (caloric deficit and weight), wound healing, days spent in the intensive care unit, ventilator days, pneumonia, number of surgeries, length of hospital stay, and mortality. Pooled analyses of binary outcomes were computed. Four studies consisting of 496 patients, met inclusion criteria. All studies were level IV evidence, but had high methodological quality. The median burn TBSA was 43.8% (interquartile range 33.4%-58.8%), with a median of 30% of patients having an inhalational injury. Patients underwent a median of 4.2 surgeries (interquartile range 1.8-7.4). Intraoperative feeding was conducted through nasoduodenal tubes. There were no aspiration events. Pooled analysis demonstrated that there were no differences in rates of aspiration, pneumonia, or wound infection (P > .05) between patients who were intraoperatively fed and those who were not. Those fed intraoperatively had significantly more surgeries, ventilator days, longer hospital stays, but lower mortality (P < .05). There was large heterogeneity in nutritional assessment methods. Intraoperatively fed patients had an average gain of 144.4 kcal/kg, 1.7 days of exclusive enteral nutrition (vs loss of -119.1 kcal/kg and -1.4 days), and a cumulative positive caloric balance of +2673 kcal +/- 2147 (vs loss of -7899 kcal +/- 3123) compared to those with interrupted feeding. Continuous intraoperative duodenal feeding during burn surgery appears to be safe in the pediatric burn population, with no reported episodes of aspiration. Uninterrupted feeding was also associated with weight maintenance and reduced caloric deficit. It may also have a survival benefit, as continuously fed patients needed more surgeries and intensive/hospital care, but had decreased mortality.
引用
收藏
页码:1343 / 1350
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impact of an enteral nutrition protocol in critically ill patients with burn injuries
    Jutba, Ada Selina
    Kamel, Amir
    Nguyen, Quynhnhu
    Patel, Kunal
    Cash, Julie
    Popp, Janet
    Mazirka, Pavel
    Roberson, Laura
    Allen, Ashlee
    Omalay, Quennie
    Cochran, Amalia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BURNS AND TRAUMA, 2024, 14 (03): : 58 - 64
  • [2] Effect of combined parenteral and enteral nutrition versus enteral nutrition alone for critically ill patients A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shi, Jialing
    Wei, Liying
    Huang, Rongzhi
    Liao, Liang
    MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (41)
  • [3] Enteral Nutrition Intolerance in Critically Ill Septic Burn Patients
    Lavrentieva, Athina
    Kontakiotis, Theodore
    Bitzani, Militsa
    JOURNAL OF BURN CARE & RESEARCH, 2014, 35 (04) : 313 - 318
  • [4] Feeding Intolerance in Critically Ill Patients with Enteral Nutrition: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
    Xu, Jing
    Shi, Wenyu
    Xie, Liying
    Xu, Jing
    Bian, Lanzheng
    JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2024, 10 (01) : 7 - 15
  • [5] Protocol-Driven Enteral Nutrition in Critically Ill Children: A Systematic Review
    Wong, Judith Ju-Ming
    Ong, Chengsi
    Han, Wee Meng
    Lee, Jan Hau
    JOURNAL OF PARENTERAL AND ENTERAL NUTRITION, 2014, 38 (01) : 29 - 39
  • [6] The effect of enteral versus parenteral nutrition for critically ill patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Gensheng
    Zhang, Kai
    Cui, Wei
    Hong, Yucai
    Zhang, Zhongheng
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2018, 51 : 62 - 92
  • [7] Early parenteral nutrition alone or accompanying enteral nutrition in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wan, Xiao
    Gao, Xuejin
    Tian, Feng
    Wu, Chao
    Wang, Xinying
    ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2015, 24 (02) : 227 - 233
  • [8] Safe Practices for Enteral Nutrition in Critically Ill Patients
    Guenter, Peggi
    CRITICAL CARE NURSING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2010, 22 (02) : 197 - +
  • [9] Early enteral nutrition in critically ill patients response
    Doig, Gordon S.
    Simpson, Fiona
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2010, 36 (06) : 1089 - 1090
  • [10] Enteral versus parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Elke, Gunnar
    van Zanten, Arthur R. H.
    Lemieux, Margot
    McCall, Michele
    Jeejeebhoy, Khursheed N.
    Kott, Matthias
    Jiang, Xuran
    Day, Andrew G.
    Heyland, Daren K.
    CRITICAL CARE, 2016, 20